med358-boise
Well-Known Member
Looked at the video. Something seems inherently flawed to me and also somewhat irrelevant. As soon as the ejector is re-installed the case is pushed forward and jammed against the back of extractor hook and the "system" has just been altered. Consider the video is referencing adjustments as little a 1/2 of 1 thousandth, I would suspect that there is well over 1/1000 of movement when the case is pushed forward by the ejector.
The relevance question is driven by...for accuracy most shooters are looking for a seating depth node and the starting point is generally jam (which is just slightly into the lands and is also somewhat neck tension dependent) minus 15-20 thousandths and then they load multiple seating depths in increments of say 3/4 thousandths some others use as much 5 to 10/thousandths. So given the starting point of jam minus 15-20 thousandths it would seem irrelevant of whether I know the contact point of the lands is exactly 2.2 vs 2.201 vs 2.202 vs 2.203 because what I care about is the base to ogive measurement for the load that is most accurate when the rifle is in the configuration when I actually shoot it not whether that load is 26 vs 29/1000 off the lands. if accuracy degrades then I evaluate everything including if I need to reduce seating depth.
What am I missing here?
The relevance question is driven by...for accuracy most shooters are looking for a seating depth node and the starting point is generally jam (which is just slightly into the lands and is also somewhat neck tension dependent) minus 15-20 thousandths and then they load multiple seating depths in increments of say 3/4 thousandths some others use as much 5 to 10/thousandths. So given the starting point of jam minus 15-20 thousandths it would seem irrelevant of whether I know the contact point of the lands is exactly 2.2 vs 2.201 vs 2.202 vs 2.203 because what I care about is the base to ogive measurement for the load that is most accurate when the rifle is in the configuration when I actually shoot it not whether that load is 26 vs 29/1000 off the lands. if accuracy degrades then I evaluate everything including if I need to reduce seating depth.
What am I missing here?
Last edited: