• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Tikka Tip of the Day….Ejector Roll Pin

nksmfamjp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2004
Messages
3,535
I did some investigation after a roll pin mishap in my reloading room. If you reload like I so where you remove the ejector for setting up dies, sooner or later, you will lose that roll pin!

My tip: it is a 2.5 x 6mm slotted roll pin or tension pin.

They are super easy to order once you find this. I looked on like a half dozen forums, so I'm posting it here. If I have to order a train load, I'll sell my excess!
 
Not sure if this works in a Tikka but it's a game changer.

Those are great, I also made one that works on the Terminus and Curtis Bolts. I normally just put it all in a gallon ziplock bag, hold the part with one hand and let the punch poke a small hole in the bag. If anything gets out of place it will stay in the bag.
 
It allows you to accurately determine where the bullet just touches the lands.
I assumed that was the basic objective and I guess my question should have been clearer "What is the advantage of this approach finding "just touches the lands" versus other approaches to finding "just touches the lands"?

Let me expand further. Any definition of "just touches" includes some amount of force measurement regarding contact with the lands (whatever the measure, if contact is made there was .001 or .002 or .003 of some force measure) and as long as that amount of force is consistent (and not excessive) good results would occur. I am trying to determine the actual advantage of this approach versus the other approaches.
 
Last edited:
I did some investigation after a roll pin mishap in my reloading room. If you reload like I so where you remove the ejector for setting up dies, sooner or later, you will lose that roll pin!

My tip: it is a 2.5 x 6mm slotted roll pin or tension pin.

They are super easy to order once you find this. I looked on like a half dozen forums, so I'm posting it here. If I have to order a train load, I'll sell my excess!
I'm wondering why you waste time removing the ejector to setup dies. Stop doing that process and stop losing gun parts from un-needed disassembly.
 
I assumed that was the basic objective and I guess my question should have been clearer "What is the advantage of this approach finding "just touches the lands" versus other approaches to finding "just touches the lands"?

Let me expand further. Any definition of "just touches" includes some amount of force measurement regarding contact with the lands (whatever the measure, if contact is made there was .001 or .002 or .003 of some force measure) and as long as that amount of force is consistent (and not excessive) good results would occur. I am trying to determine the actual advantage of this approach versus the other approaches.
I've tried several methods, including the Hornady tool, but the method Alex Wheeler describes gives me the most reliable measurement.

Take this link and then scroll down to the video titled "Finding the Lands"
 
Not familiar with this approach. What advantage does this provide for setting up the die?
A spring ejector keeps forward tension on the case, if you want to accurately measure anything from the base of the case forward like shoulder or ogive, it's best to remove the ejector. Also gives you much more feel.
 

Recent Posts

Top