victor3ranger
Well-Known Member
wow I am surprisedhttps://www.americanhunter.org/content/hardware-browning-ab3-composite-stalker/Found some accuracy result on the AB3.
Looks like an average hunting rifle in 30-06.
wow I am surprisedhttps://www.americanhunter.org/content/hardware-browning-ab3-composite-stalker/Found some accuracy result on the AB3.
Looks like an average hunting rifle in 30-06.
The AB3 from what I've read is their 'budget' line, so I assume corners were cut in places to make it 'good enough'(considering they're ~400 less than most of their lineup). I was seriously hoping I could find someone here who has had hands-on experience with one to find out just how many corners were lobbed off...wow I am surprised
I would suppose that the AB3 is intended to be direct competition for the lower end Savage ( Axis II ) and Ruger American budget lines ( ?). One can say what one will concerning the Axis II, but Savage has sold a BUNCH of them.The AB3 from what I've read is their 'budget' line, so I assume corners were cut in places to make it 'good enough'(considering they're ~400 less than most of their lineup). I was seriously hoping I could find someone here who has had hands-on experience with one to find out just how many corners were lobbed off...
That`s something you don`t see everyday. A report of an " inconsistent " ( I assume that refers to accuracy ? ) Savage rifle.My buddy has an Axis II, you couldn't give me that rifle. He has replaced the stock, bedded the action, adjusted the trigger, swapped out the *** rings and scope with a high quality rail and rings, and mounted a Zeiss scope on it, and the thing is still an inconsistent shooter even with hand loads. My wife shoots an AB3, easy to load for, accurate and consistent. For her rifle I got a trigger spring kit, had the barreled action Cerakoted, and mounted a VX-3 on it using Talley rings.
I have similar feelings for the original Axis, which the OP is looking at buying.My buddy has an Axis II, you couldn't give me that rifle. He has replaced the stock, bedded the action, adjusted the trigger, swapped out the *** rings and scope with a high quality rail and rings, and mounted a Zeiss scope on it, and the thing is still an inconsistent shooter even with hand loads.
It turns out I'm m looking at an Axis 2, but you say it's the same sans trigger ?I have similar feelings for the original Axis, which the OP is looking at buying.
My daughter has one in .223. I have put in a trigger kit and polished the trigger, and it still has a horrible trigger. You WILL want to buy the $110 Timney upgrade if you get an Axis.
Last year, I took an Axis in 30-06 belonging to a coworker's husband and accurized it.
I stiffened and painted the stock, swapped scope and rings, tried a trigger kit, and eventually swapped in a Timney. For the end cost of the rifle - with my labor being free - you could buy a MUCH better rifle. Handloads helped, but it still isn't as consistent as I would like.
The Axis II has a better Accutrigger, but the rest of the rifle is the same.
Have either of shot the ABolt for groups? I'm not expecting overlapping holes, but tight is always goodMy buddy has an Axis II, you couldn't give me that rifle. He has replaced the stock, bedded the action, adjusted the trigger, swapped out the *** rings and scope with a high quality rail and rings, and mounted a Zeiss scope on it, and the thing is still an inconsistent shooter even with hand loads. My wife shoots an AB3, easy to load for, accurate and consistent. For her rifle I got a trigger spring kit, had the barreled action Cerakoted, and mounted a VX-3 on it using Talley rings.
This is about as close to a side by side comparison as has been posted. These " Brand X vs. Brand Y " threads, while it`s understandable that folks post them, all suffer from the same shortcoming, a lack of OBJECTIVE, side by side comparisons. How many people own or otherwise have experience with BOTH an Axis II AND an AB3? Pretty much what you get, again understandably, is input from fans of the brands under consideration.My buddy has an Axis II, you couldn't give me that rifle. He has replaced the stock, bedded the action, adjusted the trigger, swapped out the *** rings and scope with a high quality rail and rings, and mounted a Zeiss scope on it, and the thing is still an inconsistent shooter even with hand loads. My wife shoots an AB3, easy to load for, accurate and consistent. For her rifle I got a trigger spring kit, had the barreled action Cerakoted, and mounted a VX-3 on it using Talley rings.
My buddy had this problem with his axis in 25-06 and lost confidence in it so decided to sell it.A minor caution for the Axis rifles with the 2 piece firing pin spring -- they are notorious for light strikes on hard primers. It won't mean anything for commercial hunting or target ammunition but if you venture into anything with harder military primers expect plentiful click/no-bang encounters. Shouldn't matter much in 270 but guys who pick up a 308 or 223 can find themselves terribly frustrated.
I would save up and purchase the 111.I agree with most of the other posts that if you want a Savage, don't buy the Axis, 111 is far superior.
Are all 3 axis rifles? I had a old model 110 in 243 that was a shooter but the stock was basically a 2x4. My friend's axis was no comparison to the cheap older savages in finish or accuracy.So you decide, there are 19 positive posts about Savage, 1 negative. I'll throw in another positive. I have 3 savages in the safe and all are shooters. 1 wears a Shaw barrel, but the original shot under 3/4 inch at 100 yards.
Mine are 2- mod 10's and a 12Are all 3 axis rifles? I had a old model 110 in 243 that was a shooter but the stock was basically a 2x4. My friend's axis was no comparison to the cheap older savages in finish or accuracy.