RockyMtnMT
Official LRH Sponsor
That is ok. We have only been around now for 2.5 years of your 20 years of reloading. If you decide to give us a try you won't be disappointed. Let me know if you have any questions.
Steve
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
Terminal performance..... velocity vs energy vs retained weight
- Thread starter Creedmoor shooter
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Steve
Predator 22
Well-Known Member
Nobody cares what the state of California thinks on pretty much anything, especially anything to do with hunting and guns.
Vortex!
Well-Known Member
California might as well be their own country since they want to be communist anyways. 
Hatrick
Well-Known Member
5th largest economy in the world, until you take out silicon valley.
Vortex!
Well-Known Member
It's also the biggest overflow of human stupidity. Everything in California causes cancer
TXAoudadKlr
Well-Known Member
For me, I've noticed with my 300AX and it 5,100ft lbs is not all that impressive on deer until ~400 yards and on. Crazy right considering it driving a 200gr accubond 3400fps? On bigger animal like aoudad 250-350lbs it's quite impressive. Flattens them on spot. Guess the extra mass, muscle and bone density play apart in transferring a greater amount of energy for more dramatic kills. I've beeb looking at some of the various monos like the cutting edge Maximus and a few of the hammers for it in hopes of the shedding petal/blades helping it out on softer game.
I also shoot a 458 socom. It nothing special with 300gr TTSX's is does a casual 1800fps. My first deer with it acted like it hadn't been hit up until he fell over despite his liver being in half. I've recovered bullets from aoudad with it that all retained 100% of their weight minus that tip and in that .840-.930" range expanded. Given the low velocity you don't get a lot of that hydrostatic shock. I did notice when I switched to the CEB 260gr Maximus loaded to ~1950fps it was far more authoritative in comparison to the TTSX. The TTSX wounds looked like a drill bit passed through. Where the CEB effects a much larger area and sometimes leaves multiple exits. Cool thing is it's soft enough to act like a TSX at longer ranges for that cartridge.
I also shoot a 458 socom. It nothing special with 300gr TTSX's is does a casual 1800fps. My first deer with it acted like it hadn't been hit up until he fell over despite his liver being in half. I've recovered bullets from aoudad with it that all retained 100% of their weight minus that tip and in that .840-.930" range expanded. Given the low velocity you don't get a lot of that hydrostatic shock. I did notice when I switched to the CEB 260gr Maximus loaded to ~1950fps it was far more authoritative in comparison to the TTSX. The TTSX wounds looked like a drill bit passed through. Where the CEB effects a much larger area and sometimes leaves multiple exits. Cool thing is it's soft enough to act like a TSX at longer ranges for that cartridge.
BRENT ERWIN
Member
We all want the mythical magic bullet, There is not a one do all bullet out there. Pick a bullet construction that you like. I like the pass through, my bullets of choice Accubonds, Accubond LR, TTSX and LRX. Shot placement and accuracy trump everything.
Rich Coyle
Well-Known Member
Well, Brent, I think there is a perfect bullet. Its only drawback is it costs a little more than others.
memtb
Well-Known Member
I prefer all three, 2900+ mv, near 100% retained weight, calibers starting with .33 and up....which will have substantial energy, if the 2900 mv is adhered to! memtb
