That's incorrect misinformation created by Hollywood. A wounded enemy is not better than a outright kill. Nobody is ever taught that we are taught to kill. A wounded enemy can recover, detonate a bomb, call in your position, etc. They don't stop and try and get the down guy like us. The whole wound one and then wait for his friends is complete bs. In my multiple deployments and training I have never been taught wounding is better. In fact if you were shooting to wound you can find yourself up on charges. Dumb politicians set in place that the military can't use bullets designed for hunting. Manufacturers get around that with marketing. Like snipers use match bullets which are designed to expand and have great terminal ballistics especially at long range. They do ballistics gel testing in house. The fbi also doesn't ballistics testing on all the match bullets for law enforcement etc. There's very specific requirements like with Berger. They have to have it labeled as OTM (open tip match) for all their military contacts. The ridiculous view that wounding is better than killing is something that drives us nuts and is almost comical. There's no military school or training that teaches that. It's nothing more than misinformation from people who never served and watch too many Hollywood movies