• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Tell me I’m crazy, 338 rpm

That's been the hard part, there's SOME but not a lot of information on that cartridge. That's where I was hoping there would be some that would chime in about first hand loading data.
I really think hot rodding a 210 ttsx or a 200 grain accubond in some Peterson brass and that thing could be a hammer!
WBY website offers 185 Barnes TTSX, and 225 Hornady Interlock/ Barnes TTSX/NAB and provided ballistics. You should have plenty of information to decipher if it meets your long range concern.

They also provided side by side comparison, and similar cartridges to compare with.
 
That's been the hard part, there's SOME but not a lot of information on that cartridge. That's where I was hoping there would be some that would chime in about first hand loading data.
I really think hot rodding a 210 ttsx or a 200 grain accubond in some Peterson brass and that thing could be a hammer!
The purpose of mathematics is a decision, not a number. I just ran the numbers for the 225 TTSX which is what the factory load is assuming only 2575 fps @ 400 yards the impact velocity is 1970 fps @ 350 is 2040 fps.

If either of those two distances constitute longer range in your mind, and since both of those numbers are adequate for expansion you have your answer.
 
One thing the younger generations can't comprehend is that fudd cartridges are extant because they have worked over a period of decades often exceeding a lifetime.

Having the hots for a new (ish) trend is not a fact to include in a comparison.

Using faster powder when barrels are shorter does not equal the performance of the traditional slower powder already used with the standard, now considered longer barrels.

The short barrel fans are avoiding the word "carbine".

Suppressors are a modern fad, something new to the masses so must be an innovation to be grasped. No, they have become more practical because of the fascination with shorter barrels which blast the ear off the side of your head.

Shorter barrels are making inroads over usual length barrels and will dominate the market. No, they will reduce the market sales because older experienced shooters (still the majority) have long memories and poor hearing and won't go there. Additionally they increase the cost of the rifle because suppressors usually cost more than a new barrel.

Adding suppresors improves the balance of your short barreled rifle. This sentence as 2 meanings if you have an open mind.

You can't put old heads on young shoulders. (My dad's famous words)
 
The purpose of mathematics is a decision, not a number. I just ran the numbers for the 225 TTSX which is what the factory load is assuming only 2575 fps @ 400 yards the impact velocity is 1970 fps @ 350 is 2040 fps.

If either of those two distances constitute longer range in your mind, and since both of those numbers are adequate for expansion you have your answer.
Like I said, WBY has provided them already, @Backcountrydreamer1996 just need to navigate through WBY's website. For instance, at 500 yards:

185 TTSX = 2080 FPS/1778 FT-LBS
225 TTSX = 1981/1961
225 Interlock = 1771/1567
225 NAB = 2051/2101
 
Yep, you're crazy!

There are lots of other cartridges I'd consider before the RPM. Not that it's bad but it was another solution looking for a problem to solve. If you do buy it, buy enough brass to outlast the barrel.
 
Top