comfisherman
Well-Known Member
I wonder if the 8mm bore has a resurgence. Not this year, maybe never but, marketing is missing an opportunity. They've covered many metric wonder cartridges lately. It seems to be a marketing scheme that has to create something 'new' every year.
The 323/8mm conundrum is probably multi factoral. It's an accute sufferer of "anything over 308 sells in small numbers". Combined with the dual whammy of it not being a 338 or 358. It's probably fair to say the 338 bullets on aggregate win at long range and 358 wins in brush rounds (granted it's a small loyal segment)
8mm remington magnum was essentially a belted ultra magnum before it was cool. Had it been released mid long range Craze with sleek bullets and dialing scopes atop 10 pound braked or suppressed guns.... well it would probably be popular. As it was it was often chambered in standard configuration rem 700s it beat the snot out of those brave enough, and was overkill for the style of hunting that was mainstream at its inception.
325 wsm always had a market asking why not a 338. For those that didn't ask they just bought a 300 wsm and loaded heavies if needed. My limited amount of 325 wsm exposure is recent, it's not a bad little combo in a kimber 8400. Recoil is stout for most folks, and let's be honest a well constructed bullet in 7 wsm will happily do everything the lower 48 requires.
For as popular as 8mm was 100 years ago, it cannot seem to get modern traction.
20 ZippenWerferKurtz > .20 Practical AI (.20-.223 AI)
.20 practical probably should have been the 204 ruger. Would have left them room for a hotter round half a decade down the line and hastened speedier adoption initially.