Yeah that is prob a good idea. This is a last minute kind of deal for a friend of mine. I had plenty of R26 and 140 elds. I just figured it would be faster than H4350.
I gotcha, it will def give you another 75-100 fps with the 140s
Yeah that is prob a good idea. This is a last minute kind of deal for a friend of mine. I had plenty of R26 and 140 elds. I just figured it would be faster than H4350.
Nice deer. Sweet little rig there. Not a fan of monos though some folks do seem to like the hammers.I shoot a 6.5 CM with a 16 inch barrel.
Try 85 grain Hammer Hunters and Varget. Right at or just over 3000 fps.
Why dont you like mono's?Nice deer. Sweet little rig there. Not a fan of monos though some folks do seem to like the hammers.
Monos are typically 100% weight retention. I dont see as good a wound channel with monos. Hammers that lose their petals may be different but typically you have to shoot a light bullet and push them hard to get decent wounding with monos especially with higher sd bullets. Besides they typically cost more and I've never had issues killing stuff with cup and core bullets.Why dont you like mono's?
I get 2650fps w/143 eldx with RL26 or superformance 16" AR.QL predicts a max load of H4350 (42.2 grains) and RL26 (48.2 grains) will get you 2527 fps and 2674 fps, respectively.
I went to monos decades ago and never looked back. I saw no difference in wound channels, lungs destroyed. I switched when i saw an xray of all the lead bits in the meat in the front half of the deer. looked like a shotgun pattern. I only shoot a few a year so cost doesnt come into itMonos are typically 100% weight retention. I dont see as good a wound channel with monos. Hammers that lose their petals may be different but typically you have to shoot a light bullet and push them hard to get decent wounding with monos especially with higher sd bullets. Besides they typically cost more and I've never had issues killing stuff with cup and core bullets.