• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Sherman Wildcats pressure limits?

.......I confess to being slow to believe this, but too many people I consider reliable to the first order, are bringing me around!
I don't pretend to be all that smart, and really don't know exactly how some of these things work. What I have learned is that if I pay attention to smart people and do the things, in some combination, that work for them, I usually have more success. I think this applies to life in general, not just ballistics. People like P.O. Ackley come to mind, and it's no accident that most of my cartridges are similar to his.
When you combine Ackleys work with more recent pioneers by including shorter burning columns, good things happen.
Cartridges like the 6 BR, are an example.
 
Last edited:
Some of this I find quite interesting. I'd like to learn more about which powders typically "pressure up" different/sooner/ later than others. I have a 338SS and with my crappy RP brass I have seen pressure signs with some powder earlier than with others and with different velocities. I'd like to learn why so I can narrow down my powder choices for a variety of reasons; case life, throat life, temp stability, efficiency, safety, etc etc. I will soon be getting Rich's ADG brass and am interested to see the difference with some of my current loads that showed pressure signs.
I can give you an example that stands out quite considerably just in case shape/caliber size.
The 300WM thrives on slow powders like RE25/6, H1000 and Retumbo.
The 338WM thrives on powders like RE19, H4350 and H4831.
The 338 seems to top out with powders like RE22, where RE19 often beats it for velocity,
and powders like H1000 just are too slow to work correctly.

There is a general rule of thumb that straight walled or minimum shouldered cases work best with medium burn powders. For example, the 375 H&H, 375 WBY and 458 Lott all perform best with powders like H4350, W760/H414 and RE15.
The reason for this is due to the free and smooth flow from case body to the neck, the powder is not held back in the case as it burns and is following the bullets transfer into the rifling, changing HOW it burns. A slow powder, which I have tried, does not burn completely or in a progressive fashion. Simply put, it fizzles out as the gas cannot fill the void the bullet is leaving behind it. Powder needs pressure and heat to keep burning inside a barrel.

Cheers.
 
And the reverse is a 40 degree building pressure at a different rate/curve and is why different powders act so much differently depending on case design and including burn column length within the case itself.
I kind of see it like 2 different Chambers, in a sense. The first being what happens inside the case itself and the second in the entire length of the barrel. Obviously, what happens in the first stage influences the second stage.
Thanks for that "magnum"!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top