- Joined
- May 2, 2001
- Messages
- 7,521
The comments below came to me in an email from Don G.
While I'm not a member I do love to read the forums and the Wet barrel with the carbon ring thread is very interesting to me. Spent 38 years as an intell analyst for the Army and was also a competitive shooter and am now a long range hunter.
As a analyst, I quickly learned that you must view info from every conceivable perspective. Thus far, the best data on the wet barrel was provided by the gentleman that soaked the end of the barrel in water and then measured the velocity and accuracy. A solid indicator of the effect of water in the barrel.
The carbon ring is another matter. Here is my read on the carbon ring. If the ring were only a uniform .001" thick, would that not, in effect, reduce the barrel inside diameter by .002"? If so, would that not swage the bullet .002" smaller in diameter? How much would .002" of wear effect the accuracy of a formerly sub-MOA barrel? I believe the bullet being reduced in diameter by the ring allows that bullet to simply rattle down the bore with considerably less accuracy.
What we are doing here is increasing the difficulty in analysis by combining two separate problems. Finding out what built up the carbon ring is the hard part. Only the person starting this thread could replicate the conditions under which the carbon ring occurred. If he can replicate those conditions and test a dry barrel with the ring for accuracy can the problem truly be solved. After all, the reduction of bullet diameter is only my theory until proven otherwise but I believe approaching the solution from the perspective of the bullet rather than from bore condition alone opens up more possibilities.
Where multiple conditions exist, separate them to make a more valid analysis. Then, the simplest answer is most likely the correct answer.