I've never had or used a chronograph. I'm going to buy one. I woulld like your opinion -input- recomendations on this. I don't think I need anything elabarate. Just something that will let me know what speeds I'm dealing with. Thanks Mike
The problem with Chronos is that the less expensive ones will have you pulling your hair out wishing it it would work right every time.
My advice is cry once and get a CED M2. Mine and the others I see in use around here have been near flawless.
Now someone will be along shortly to tell you they suck but I think if you look around the reviews will be vastly more positive than negative.
The most important use for chronographs is bragging about velocity on the internet.
This may seem cynical, but this is a real need and motivation. I can get 4200 fps from my .223 with Blue Dot powder and 35 gr Vmax bullets. That information is not useful directly and the load is not useful. But the chrono is indirectly useful.
It gives us a frame of reference to document and discuss our hobby, but it will never give us a better load than we can get without one.
I have shot a hole through two "shooting chrony"s.
I have shot a hole through one "pro chrono"
I am now on my second [my fourth chronograph] "pro chrono"
If I shoot a chonograph once per 10 handguns shots, and never shoot a chonograph with a rifle, then I can skip chronographing handguns for a year and get many rifle data for cheap.
I like the pro chrono much better the the shooting chonys.
The pro chrono triggers better.
Yeah, I have to take some issue with Clark. A chrono is useful for much more than bragging rights.
I shoot every single round during load development through a chrono and you find that velocity is a darn good indicator of pressure. Thats one solid use.
The next for me is drop charts, when you have settled on a load the chrono data will get your drop charts pretty close, and you can fine tune them to match the real world from there. I suppose this could be done without chrono data but havig it sure gets you in the ballpark quickly.
Third is deciding on otherwise equal loads or components. Velocity variation matters when you get ouut there aways. And you need to know what the trade off is for a change from one component to another. For example: my .308 shoots 168 and 175 Bergers equally well, it would take hundreds of rounds to pick a real winner between the two from an accuracy standpoint. From the Chrono I know though that the 175s require such a tradeoff in velocity that the high BC cannot overcome the difference downrange.
My CED M2 has missed very few readings in its life and the only ones I remember were muzzleloader shots where I had to play with the distance from the muzzle so it would not read the sabot instead. I usually do load development at the range at the edge of light in the morning when the wind is lowest. So it is important to me that the Chrono work on my schedule not force me to work on it's.
"I don't think I need anything elabarate. Just something that will let me know what speeds I'm dealing with. Thanks Mike"
Okay Mike, for that anything on the market is "reasonable", they all work.
But, as an alternate view, I've never known anyone who bought a new truck and later said he wished it had less horsepower. Never known anyone who buught a new boat and said he wished it was a tad shorter. Never knew anyone who bought a new house and said he wished it was a bit smaller. Etc.
Meaning, going inexpensive at first will cover your "present needs" but not your needs, or at least your wishes, later. The Chronys are inexpensive. The "Pro Chrono" single units are simple to set up. Both types put the works in the line of fire and, if you are clumsy, they will surely get blown away. (And the width of the legs and overhead diffusers on any of them is larger than the actual sensitive focused portion of their photo lenses.)
I agonised over the same questions as you. I chose to bite the bullet, so to speak, and spend a bit more to get a much more capabable chronograph. My PACT Pro was double the cost of a good Chrony but still not tremensously high from MidwayUSA. (It only has the two inexpensive sky screens in harms way, haven't shot them yet but I've only been using it about 12 years so far )!
The main unit sits on the bench in front of me. It includes a printer and an internal computer which can do multiple tasks. It records the shot string, gives a running average and does standard deviation, extreme spread, etc. It also calculates and prints trajectory and windage charts for any range and wind I wish. It can compute "point blank" ranges for any set of condition I feed it. It can factor in the altitude, temp, humitity, sight height above the bore. It can also figure the ballistic coefficent of any bullet I can give it data on muzzle and 100 yard velocities for. It does gun recoil energy, kinetic energy and momentum of the bullet. Etc. And it's quite easy to set up too.
Or you can get a minimum unit which will give velocity if you really don't think you will ever want more data. But .... bigger, faster, stronger is always better?
I've got a 19' boat I'm going to sell next spring. I'm just not able to wrestle the boat on the trailer like I used to.( Montana has some stiff breezes at times). I already have it's replacement: a drift boat.