Prefered Bipod height for prone shooting

encoreguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
84
I have decided to add a Harris swivel bipod with the leg notches to my wish list. Now I cannot decide which height to get, 6-9" or 9-13". I will not use it for bench shooting but for prone hunting shots. Any recommendations?
 
I have decided to add a Harris swivel bipod with the leg notches to my wish list. Now I cannot decide which height to get, 6-9" or 9-13". I will not use it for bench shooting but for prone hunting shots. Any recommendations?


Something to consider in your quest, is the terrain you will be hunting in.
Where I live on the plains we have a lot of tall grasses where it is necessary to have the height of the taller models ( we use the 9-13"), however if you live in rocky or desert type terrain you might be able to get by with the "6-9"


*Prairie Princess*
 
It is interesting the answers I get here verses on other sites. On the various "sniper" sites they almost unamously vote for the 6-9" saying the 9-13" is too high for a good position unless you are shooting up hill. Now I am really confused. Different perspectives I guess.
 
It also might depend on your body build. I spent quite a lot of time on water skiis when I was younger so the upper body is kinda thick. Getting older hasn't helped either!:D
 
Ideally, one does want to be as low and solid as possible, but body types vary and cover trumps all. I'd agree that the body build is probably the most important thing if muzzle clearance isn't a problem.

For actually hunting from a wide variety of cover and positions, I'd opt for the taller bipod, knowing it will be most often used to get muzzle clearance. For shooting tactical/precision matches, I carry both.

IMO, the most stable positioning comes with getting the butt properly into the shoulder, which drives consistent cheek weld and recoil recovery. The rear rest should then stabilize the butt at the right spot, then the bipod adjusted to get on target. Fine elevation adjustments can then be made with the rear bag.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top