Warbird2006
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 412
Yes, he's an Olympic winnerYes, I know that. Do you think I should leave the forum? To me 400 yards is long range. I hope my perspective on shooting has not troubled you...
Yes, he's an Olympic winnerYes, I know that. Do you think I should leave the forum? To me 400 yards is long range. I hope my perspective on shooting has not troubled you...
Mine does 2911 with 215 grain Berger's and 75 grains of H1000I get better accuracy with H1000. Pushing a 215 @3000 FPS
What Hornady hunting bullet is better than the 195? Because I would love to try them.I think, in my humble opinion, Hornady, Hornady makes way better hunting bullets than Bergers.
Look up Carlos Hathcock once, he used a lil ole Winchester model 70 30.06 with an 8 power scope. Just a standard model 70"The extra range isn't imaginary for everyone. Why do you need the state-of-the-art (for 1963) 300 Win Mag when the old standby 30-06 works fine to 300 yards? Everything was new once. If we'd stopped when perfection was achieved then there'd be nothing new after the 30-06, especially not that silly 270 the kids rave about."
You do know you are posting up in LONG Range Hunting forum?
It was a model 70, but not exactly standard. It had a different barrel and was accurized by the Marine Corps Armory. Most of the sniper rifles of that era had the unertl 10x, not sure what Carlos used.Look up Carlos Hathcock once, he used a lil ole Winchester model 70 30.06 with an 8 power scope. Just a standard model 70
Look up Carlos Hathcock once, he used a lil ole Winchester model 70 30.06 with an 8 power scope. Just a standard model 70
Has anybody tried the new Hornady .300 win mag high performance ammo? According to the Hornady charts you can buy a factory load and fire it in a 24 inch barrel, and move a high BC 180 grain bullet at 3100 fps. Zeroed in at 200 yards you are only 5.5 inches low at three hundred. This fact makes one wonder why anybody would ever need the imaginary extra range of something like the 28 Nosler. Why not just stick with what is tried and true and not so expensive? Another of asking this is, in real life conditions does the purported superiority of the fancy "state-of-the-art" rounds like the Nosler calibers enough of an improvement to matter? Or is it merely planned obsolescence?