DoneNOut
Well-Known Member
How's the case capacity on this long brass? Peterson is known for reduced capacity in other calibers.
.003 is just fine. I did a blind test of different runout variance rounds 15yrs ago. .001, .003, .008 concentricity. Sold my runout gauge after seeing no difference in groups between.001 and .008.What's an acceptable amount of run out? I've been reloading for years but fairly new to the the super precise tricks. I'm getting around .003 average. I just took 25 new piece of brass, measured everything as I went, all was good and all had consistent neck tension of .002 and felt the same when seating a bullet.
My rifle is all high quality components. Bighorn action, proof barrel, Mesa stock, bedded and floated. It is a new rifle so I don't have a base line to compare to before working with the Peterson brass.
Case capacity is significantly less than the Nosler, Hornady and Winchester brass I've used.How's the case capacity on this long brass? Peterson is known for reduced capacity in other calibers.
About a month ago I loaded 150 rounds of Peterson 300 win mag long brass for my new 300 win mag. I've shot about 80 of the 150 so far. I'm getting 1/2 MOA with the first load in this brass and haven't noticed fliers unless I "pulled the shot". I did run the brass through a Redding neck sizing die before loading. I noticed no difference in pressure to seat the bullet.I just started working with my 300 win mag and Peterson long brass. Has anybody have any experience with this brass yet?? It seem the the neck tension is extremely inconsistent on mine. The brass looks annealed from the factory, maybe not enough?? The groups reflect this as well. I will get 3 touching and a flyer 3/4-1" out
I'm going to try Annealing again and see if that resolves the issue.