Novice: 7RM out to 600 yds.

Howdy Ro,

Welcome to LRH :)

You have gotten a lot of good advice so far. I have a couple of 7mmRM's also. There are a lot of good bullets and powder to choose from with the 7mmRM and some other good powders that I didn't see listed yet are RL17, RL19 and Retumbo. These should all give good velocity.

As for bullets, some good ones have been mentioned I would pick the one that shot the most accurate. I would start with the 140 gr bullets first becuase they will be a little flaltter out to 600 yds. If you go beyond 600 yds, the hevier, higher BC bullets will do better. Here is an online balistic program that can help you determine how differnt bullets will perform.

External Ballistics Calculator

I have always zerod my scopes at 200 yds, because it requires less holdover at farther distances. Zeroing at 250 yds would be even better. Once again, you can use the ballistics program to see what the differences are.

The Bushnell Elite 3200 5-15 with the mil dot reticle should work well for you. The mil dots will help you determine your holdovers.

Good shooting and good hunting,

-MR
 
Howdy Ro,

Welcome to LRH :)

You have gotten a lot of good advice so far. I have a couple of 7mmRM's also. There are a lot of good bullets and powder to choose from with the 7mmRM and some other good powders that I didn't see listed yet are RL17, RL19 and Retumbo. These should all give good velocity.

As for bullets, some good ones have been mentioned I would pick the one that shot the most accurate. I would start with the 140 gr bullets first becuase they will be a little flaltter out to 600 yds. If you go beyond 600 yds, the hevier, higher BC bullets will do better. Here is an online balistic program that can help you determine how differnt bullets will perform.

External Ballistics Calculator

I have always zerod my scopes at 200 yds, because it requires less holdover at farther distances. Zeroing at 250 yds would be even better. Once again, you can use the ballistics program to see what the differences are.

The Bushnell Elite 3200 5-15 with the mil dot reticle should work well for you. The mil dots will help you determine your holdovers.

Good shooting and good hunting,

-MR

Hey brother...this site really got some very nice people who are taking the time sharing some great info...I'm stoked...:D

I going through all that's been said and I'm getting a bit confused about bullet selection and weight, but that's probaly because everyone has different opinions about certain things as it should! More than one way to do it...:D

I just have to make an educated-decision which route I'd like to try first!

Bottom-line is I want to extend my effective range at harvesting game deer and pigs...I'm just using a factory rifle and the scope I mentioned and want to keep this as simple as possible!

Maybe I should stay within 400-500yds I don't know right now... and maybe then I could shoot 140/154 grainers???

I don't know the pros and cons and how much diff it would make???

Anybody?

I'm not second-guessing any info I've gotten as you folks are the experts, but I just wanted a greater understanding in regards to range and BC and velocity and energy how it all works!

Thanks all:D
 
I going through all that's been said and I'm getting a bit confused about bullet selection and weight, but that's probaly because everyone has different opinions about certain things as it should! More than one way to do it...:D

Maybe I should stay within 400-500yds I don't know right now... and maybe then I could shoot 140/154 grainers???

I don't know the pros and cons and how much diff it would make???

I just wanted a greater understanding in regards to range and BC and velocity and energy how it all works!

Thanks all:D

There are couple different ways to look at this. First let's address BC or Ballistic Coefficient. This is a given number to a projectile to determine its ability to maintain stability over a given distance. The higher the ballistic Coefficient the greater the distance you can shoot with great effectiveness. The lower the number, the shorter the distance you can shoot effectively. This number is based off of its ability to maintain its velocity and true flight when going super sonic to subsonic speeds without tumbling over a given distance.

Example (these are theoretical numbers just for examples sake, so do not judge your opinion of any given projectile from what this example is stating.)

223 caliber 55 grain bullet BC=.250
This bullet will be fast out of the gate. Muzzle velocity will be somewhere around 3300-3500 fps. At 100 yards it will lose about 500-600 fps and the farther the bullet flies the quicker velocity is lost and the more it begins to nose dive to the earth. Plus now this bullet is more subject to being pushed by the wind making longer shots out to 400-500 yards a lot harder. It is achievable but you must know how to read the wind. For example say at 500 yards this bullet is going 1700fps in a 10mile per hour wind it may push 30-40 inches from point of aim. (Numbers don't reflect actual calculations.) These bullets are good for short range target and varmints to about 300yards

Now take a heavier caliber.
7mm RM 162 grain A-Max= .625 (Designed for target usage at extended range and some use for hunting)
At the muzzle velocity 3000 fps, at 100 yrds=2850fps. This shows that the bullet can maintain its speed at a longer distance retaining its energy. At 500 yards this bullet will still be at a speed of 2300-2400 fps. In a 10mph wind this bullet will only drift about 8 inches. These bullets are good for 1k target and medium and large game to about 1k depending on actual velocity. One guy on this site shot an elk with a 7mm STW at 1300yards with this bullet and dropped the elk. So it is all about shot placement.

I checked the numbers on a calculator (to make sure I wasn't to outlandish with my example) and I am pretty darn close in my guesses. As you can see the heavier high ballistic coefficient round is going to be more consistent in flight, more stable and more accurate at extended range. Now I used two different calibers, but they are comparable for example and if you use a heavier .224 diameter bullet in a heavier bullet like the 80 or 90 grain bullet you will see the same thing comparing them to the 55 grain bullet.

The heavier bullets will also retain more energy for knocking down bigger game at extended range. The lighter the bullet the more speed you need to compensate for the lack of mass created by the heavier projectile. The only drawback to heavier projectiles is the length of the bullet. This length requires a tighter twist in the rifling to create and maintain stability. New rifles designed for long range usage generally have a tight enough twist, but you will have to do some research to make sure the factory barrel can handle the bullet you want to shoot. Otherwise you would have to get a custom barrel to handle the heavier, longer projectiles.

When choosing a bullet, you need to take into consideration the type of game you are harvesting. For lighter smaller game and predator, light bullets of any type will work. For Whitetail and heavier game, bear, elk, etc., a heavier bullet and its ability to hold together when piercing heavy flesh and bone are paramount when shooting long range. Berger has a different theory and most that use the bullet can't deny its ability to take game. Their theory is fragmentation within the animal causing mass organ damage and failure. Many guys use the berger because it knocks game down, is extremely accurate and has very high BC's. Their quality on their product is very high and I would suggest this as a viable option when choosing your bullet. The accubonds will hold together and do a better job of exiting the animal causing more bleeding out if they don't stop walking at point of impact. Other variations of this controlled expansion is the partition, barnes bullets made from gilding metals and not lead filled.

Hope this helps,
Tank
 
Last edited:
Hey brother...this site really got some very nice people who are taking the time sharing some great info...I'm stoked...:D

I going through all that's been said and I'm getting a bit confused about bullet selection and weight, but that's probaly because everyone has different opinions about certain things as it should! More than one way to do it...:D

I just have to make an educated-decision which route I'd like to try first!

Bottom-line is I want to extend my effective range at harvesting game deer and pigs...I'm just using a factory rifle and the scope I mentioned and want to keep this as simple as possible!

Maybe I should stay within 400-500yds I don't know right now... and maybe then I could shoot 140/154 grainers???

I don't know the pros and cons and how much diff it would make???

Anybody?

I'm not second-guessing any info I've gotten as you folks are the experts, but I just wanted a greater understanding in regards to range and BC and velocity and energy how it all works!

Thanks all:D

Hey Ro,

We dont mean to confuse you. I'll try to explain.

BC = Ballistic Coefficient.

Ballistic Coefficient is how well a bullet travels through the air. A bullet with a pointy nose goes better and faster through the air than a bullet with a round or flat nose. Heavier bullets have better BC's than lighter bullets of the same shape.

For shooting out to 600 yds it doesnt really doesnt matter which bullet you pick from the ones that have been suggested.

My order of prefference would be...

140 Nosler AB
139 Hornady Interbond
140 Barnes TTSX
150 Nosler E-Tip
154 Hornady Interbond
150 Barnes TTSX
160 Nosler AB
140 Nosler BT
160 Nosler BT
162 Hornady Amax

Any of these bullets will do well out to 600 yds if they shoot accurately in your rifle. That's a lot to pick from, so the best thing to do is start with one bullet form the list and try it. If it shoots small groups, it's good to go. :)
 
Hey Tank...

BINGO...BINGO...BINGO...

I got it now brother!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It ALL makes plain sense to me and I'm ready to approach this with some solid insight!

Thank you very much for your wisdom and time I sincerely appreciate it!!!!!!

I'll go and check my barrel's twist and get back here later today!!!!!!

Awesome!

Roland
 
MR...

Thanks for sharing that info with me I appreciate it....:D

You folks are the best...

I'll get back with more info as to the direction I'll be going for my rig and hope to get your feedback then we'll go from there...:D

Right on!
 
.25MOA from a 7mm is some fine shooting. 1/2MOA has become fairly standard and I don't know how I'd get in any smaller. Hasn't stopped me from trying. :D
I use RL22, Retumbo, VhitaVouri 560, IMR 4831, and a smattering of H1000. Retumbo gives me good velocities with 168 VLD. 3050 or there about.

I have been using Federal 215 primers but I may have to try some non mag primers. They seem to be working for AJ.

AS previously stated I find that I have to bump the shoulder 1-2 thou with each resizing. My loaded round runout is usually 5thou but I quit turning the necks.

Scope wise I might check the want add here and on other sites. I've always wanted to try the supersniper 10 or 14x but never thrown down the cast. You really need something with ballistic turrents if you are going to try and shoot 600 yrds.
 
.25MOA from a 7mm is some fine shooting. 1/2MOA has become fairly standard and I don't know how I'd get in any smaller. Hasn't stopped me from trying. :D
I use RL22, Retumbo, VhitaVouri 560, IMR 4831, and a smattering of H1000. Retumbo gives me good velocities with 168 VLD. 3050 or there about.

I have been using Federal 215 primers but I may have to try some non mag primers. They seem to be working for AJ.

AS previously stated I find that I have to bump the shoulder 1-2 thou with each resizing. My loaded round runout is usually 5thou but I quit turning the necks.

Scope wise I might check the want add here and on other sites. I've always wanted to try the supersniper 10 or 14x but never thrown down the cast. You really need something with ballistic turrents if you are going to try and shoot 600 yrds.

Thanks for sharing and confirming several things here....I appreciate it!!!

I'm not sure about the scope advise at this point and maybe someone will chime in regarding the scope I'm getting versus one with target TURRETS...Right now I haven't got a clue...:cool:
 
Thanks for sharing and confirming several things here....I appreciate it!!!

I'm not sure about the scope advise at this point and maybe someone will chime in regarding the scope I'm getting versus one with target TURRETS...Right now I haven't got a clue...:cool:

Ro, Target turrests are very nice to have but you dont "need" target turrets for 600 yd shooting. You dont even "need" target turrets for 1K shooting. If you learn how to use the mildots on the scope (fairly easy) that will work fine and it's much quicker than dialing target turrets. If you can afford and want to spend the money for tartge turrets, then get them. They are very nice to have. But if you get them, make sure you get good ones. If you dont get good ones, they will cause you trouble. If you want a scope with target turrets, I would recommend a NF 2 1/2 - 10 x 32. You can get them on Gunbroker for $1291 with rings.

Nightforce NXS 2.5x10x32 free rings : Scopes / Optics at GunBroker.com

or you might get a good deal on Ebay

If you dont want to spend the $$$ on a god scope with target turrets then stick to the Bushnell 3200. It will do well for you at 600 yds if you learn how to use the mil dots.

-MR
 
I like the Nikon Buchmasters series. I would also look at Sightron SIII, Leupold, Bushnell Elite 4200, the 3200 would be good, and the Nikon Monarch series. They all offer good optics for less money than Night Force. If you can afford the Night Force then go for that one.

The Bushnells are great scopes and have reliable clicks. My cousin has the 4200 Elite. I have two Buckmaster Nikon's because of the cost and they are reliable. I have the 4.5-14X40 w/ mil-dots and the 6-18X40 w/ fine cross hair and target dot. Good scope for little ground hogs at 1000yards. I don't rely on mildots and like to twittle my knobs for distance.

Tank
 
Tank and MR...

Thanks for clarifying this for me again as others too and AJ mentioned once I learn how to read the mil-dots I'll be fine out to my distances...sigh of relief...this brother just ain't got that type of "kajinkies" in my wallet...:D

BTW I have confirmed that I have a 9 1/4 twist in my barrel so if I understand things correctly...A.O.K for the 160 grainers should I decide to go that route...

Aloha!

Ro
 
That would be correct Ro. Just so you know, you should be able to pickup the Nikons I mentioned for under $300. For the long stuff the the 6-18X40 with either mil-dots or target dot gets my nod. Don't forget to consider the rings and base. If you can make sure you get some decent rings to clamp down on the scope. I use Burris XTR rings and Warne Rings. Both snug up good.

Tank
 
Tank and MR...

Thanks for staying with me on all of this....:D

I appreciate it!

Now I'll start getting my components for reloading and figure which scope to get of the ones made mention!

This is the best Forum I've ever visited bar-none as the help and comaraderie has been incredible and genuine!!! The EXPERTISE above anything I've ever imagined...easy-going folks who know what in heavens their doing! I commend you all gang!

It'll take me a couple weeks or so to get everything in order including a new job I got....but I'll be back and give a report of how I'm getting along!

I got the rifle and (100) WW Brass....

Now I need to get.....:D

Scope
Range-finder
Chrony
160 Accubonds
162gr A-max
RL-22
Remington 9 1/2 primers

....and get down to some serious and FUN load developmentgun)

Thank you all for getting me well-acquainted with so much valuable information in this incredible discipline and sport...I'll never be the same!:D

And special thanks to AJ as he's answered many questions I had via PM and tonight a lengthy phone call...

I needed everyone of you to have the type of understanding that I do right now...:) I'm stoked to have your friendship and consider it my privilege!

Aloha and God Bless!

Ro
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top