Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nightforce vs Leupold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2948151" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>No they aren't, they do work pretty good. I've used them before and it doesn't take a ton of work to work out what the stadia lines actually translate to for a particular load. Good option for what I'll call intermediate range - 300-600 yards with a cartridge that has some good arc to it and you can't dial a second MBPR that's long enough to be useful.</p><p></p><p>This is my favorite reticle right now - 0.5mil windage subtensions, with a minimalist grid. I watched Greg D's videos of shooting P-Dogs where he showed through the scope with a camera - that sold me instantly and I haven't been disappointed. Has worked well for me, I'm using on a 204 Ruger and 17 HMR currently.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]511159[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is an example of what I think has way too much going on for a hunting scope. I use this reticle (and the IMO slightly better Tremor 5) on several rifles, but unless I'm shooting multiple targets at multiple ranges in one string of fire like at a PRS match most of the junk is just in the way. I say the T5 is better because it doesn't have the rapid ranging lines or moving target numbers on the windage line and de-clutters the area where holds are when you dial elevation. Fantastic reticle for what it was designed for though - full on combat chaos.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]511160[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2948151, member: 116181"] No they aren't, they do work pretty good. I've used them before and it doesn't take a ton of work to work out what the stadia lines actually translate to for a particular load. Good option for what I'll call intermediate range - 300-600 yards with a cartridge that has some good arc to it and you can't dial a second MBPR that's long enough to be useful. This is my favorite reticle right now - 0.5mil windage subtensions, with a minimalist grid. I watched Greg D's videos of shooting P-Dogs where he showed through the scope with a camera - that sold me instantly and I haven't been disappointed. Has worked well for me, I'm using on a 204 Ruger and 17 HMR currently. [ATTACH type="full" width="269px" alt="Gen_2XR__65262.jpg"]511159[/ATTACH] This is an example of what I think has way too much going on for a hunting scope. I use this reticle (and the IMO slightly better Tremor 5) on several rifles, but unless I'm shooting multiple targets at multiple ranges in one string of fire like at a PRS match most of the junk is just in the way. I say the T5 is better because it doesn't have the rapid ranging lines or moving target numbers on the windage line and de-clutters the area where holds are when you dial elevation. Fantastic reticle for what it was designed for though - full on combat chaos. [ATTACH type="full" width="267px" alt="Tremor3__35830.jpg"]511160[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nightforce vs Leupold
Top