Zeiss V6 3-18x50
The Zeiss is 18x not 32x. The tensile seems like a solid optic but so they offer the same magnification for a similar price?The Trigicon 10 mile
Zeiss V6 3-18x50
The Zeiss is 18x not 32x. The tensile seems like a solid optic but so they offer the same magnification for a similar price?The Trigicon 10 mile
I have one on a short action anti-x with no issues. The tube is not long enough to fit on my long action anti-x.I wonder if I would have fitment issues with the 20x nx8,on a Defiance anti, 6 Prc that has the integrated rail
This is a good point.No reason to get the 2.5x20 over the 4x32 unless 4 power is too much for you .
While I agree with your general statement I take that RS test with a BIG grain of salt.
With everything there are compromises. Many lightweight scopes use plastic on some of the internal parts which cannot be as durable as metal. Glass quality plays a big role in not only optical quality but also weight.i will never try to bash something I have not experienced first hand. There are obviously some issues with the NX8 eye box and mounting space for individuals running a LA with integrated spit rail actions. I'm glad I didn't go this route on my LA Anti X. There are many people that are huge fans of NF. Durability seems to be the top reason I hear about their products. I struggle with going with big and heavy scopes on a hunting rig. Weight introduces not only discomfort when carrying the rifle, but also puts more stress on the optic and mounting points under heavy recoil. I would really like to try a NF scope, but they just don't make a scope that meets my requirements. Maybe one day they will.
I get it that compromise is a big factor. However, there are manufacturers that seems to be able to build a alpha or near that level of performance under 30 ozs without limiting mounting space and eye box issues with glass that is equal to or better than NF today. I'm talking about hunting scopes that are capable of reliably dialing to LRH distances. TT, March, Zeiss, and Leupold among others are doing it on some of their offerings.With everything there are compromises. Many lightweight scopes use plastic on some of the internal parts which cannot be as durable as metal. Glass quality plays a big role in not only optical quality but also weight.
It cannot be argued against that NF scopes have been proven to be robust, reliable and repeatable.
Some of the other lighter options, maybe not so much.
Sacrifices have to be made somewhere to make them lighter and you have to make choices as to what are important to you.
It should be noted that almost all alpha scopes (NF, ZCO, Kahles, Razor, etc) are typically substantially heavier than other scopes in the same category. The Vortex LHT is a good example. There is no doubt that compromises were made to get the scope to the weight it is.
I just sold an NX8. Prefer the NXS. More forgiving eyebox and no dopy zoom ring. Grab the ocular and turn. Glass wasn't different enough for me to care about.
Zeiss V6 3-18x50
You my friend have a problem.