New JBM range card

So far I don't find that it works very well using Mil-dot. Either I lose 200 yards between 100 and 300 or it only goes up to 3 with 2 being above and below that.

IE

Trajectory μCard - Constant Drop Handi Rifle .223 55 gr 3240 fps # Range Drop Wind # Range Drop Wind
(yd) (mil) (mil)
(yd) (mil) (mil) 1 101 4.00 0.28... 6 666 -1.00 2.72
......................2 306 3.00 0.97 ... 7 724 -2.00 3.07
.......................3 427 2.00 1.46... 8 775 -3.00 3.40
.......................4 522 1.00 1.92... 9 822 -4.00 3.70
.......................5 600 -0.00 2.33... 10 864 -5.00 3.97
10/08/09 11:33, JBM/jbmucardd-5.0.cgi

and
Trajectory μCard - Constant Drop Handi Rifle .223 55 gr 3240 fps # Range Drop Wind # Range Drop Wind
(yd) (mil) (mil)
(yd) (mil) (mil) 1 50 1.00 0.14..... 6 582 -2.00 2.23
.......................2 101 2.00 0.28... 7 651 -3.00 2.63
.......................3 270 1.00 0.83... 8 711 -4.00 2.99
.......................4 400 -0.00 1.35... 9 763 -5.00 3.32
.......................5 500 -1.00 1.81



10/08/09 11:09, JBM/jbmucardd-5.0.cgi
 
Last edited:
So far I don't find that it works very well using Mil-dot. Either I lose 200 yards between 100 and 300 or it only goes up to 3 with 2 being above and below that.

IE

1 101 4
2 311 3
3 431 2
4 525 1
5 603 0
6 669 -1
7 727 -2
8 778 -3
9 824 -4
10 866 -5

and
Trajectory μCard - Constant Drop Handi Rifle .223 55 gr 3240 fps # Range Drop Wind # Range Drop Wind
(yd) (mil) (mil)
(yd) (mil) (mil) 1 50 1.00 0.14 6 582 -2.00 2.23 2 101 2.00 0.28 7 651 -3.00 2.63 3 270 1.00 0.83 8 711 -4.00 2.99 4 400 -0.00 1.35 9 763 -5.00 3.32 5 500 -1.00 1.81



10/08/09 11:09, JBM/jbmucardd-5.0.cgi


I don't understand, are you saying it's incorrect or that you don't like that there isn't a line for each of 100, 200 and 300 yd areas? Since a mil is 3.6moa, it makes sense that at the closer ranges, a mil change in point of aim will cause more than 100yds of point of impact change.

AJ
 
You are correct that the closer is more change. I'm going to quit trying to fuss with it and just tell it I have -9 steps and start zero @ 100 and see what it gives me. Unfortunately it's unlike that I'll ever be using a NightForce scope, as nice as they are.

Well I ran it up with .25 mil dot intervals and I believe that will be quite acceptable. The card is a bit bigger....but it'll do.
 
Last edited:
Obviously a mil-dot reticle is not high resolution. However, you can run the program with 1/4 or even 1/10 mi steps and interpolate between the dots. You should NOT estimate by a portion of the range distance as that is not linear, but a chart which predicts 10ths of mils will be accurate if you simply estimate the linear distnce between the dots.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top