• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Need Help w/ OCW Results

After seeing the target 44.1 is definitely your best load... Any more testing besides seating depth is a waste of components.

That is my thought as well. The only thing better than that group would be putting them all in the same hole. That group can't be more than 1/4" from the looks of it.
 
I was interpreting the node as the center most point not a range. Is that incorrect?
Yes, that is incorrect.


Does that mean it's not necessary to narrow it down to the .1 grain?
No, my last line says, 'I would choose the center-most point; that which is most "free from vibratory motion."'
The "center-most point" of the "node" has the most potential to be your load's charge weight.
 
Yes, that is incorrect.



No, my last line says, 'I would choose the center-most point; that which is most "free from vibratory motion."'
The "center-most point" of the "node" has the most potential to be your load's charge weight.

Thanks!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top