QuietTexan
Well-Known Member
Option 4 (4:03) - He used a -0.003" bushing then a -0.002" mandrel. No joke he's moving to neck too much. Good thing bushings and mandrels come in increments so you don't have to squeeze the **** out of the necks like he did. Could have used a -0.002" bushing and a -.0.001" mandrel to better effect.
I've put my money where my mouth is on this, I'm on the list for an AMP press and I won't comment on what the charts should look like until I can actually do it myself and see.
Also, this, which I agree with and don't need to retype because he said it best. Credit to @Mikecr:
I've put my money where my mouth is on this, I'm on the list for an AMP press and I won't comment on what the charts should look like until I can actually do it myself and see.
Also, this, which I agree with and don't need to retype because he said it best. Credit to @Mikecr:
There is importance to pre-expansion that should also be considered.
Downsizing adds energy to brass. The brass will then seek lowest energy balance by springing back counter last action. Most at once, but continuing over time. So if last action is downsizing the brass springs back outward, and will continue to relieve itself over time. So if bullet seating after collet sizing does not upsize necks, then tension will decrease over time. You would need to excessively downsize, so that seating bullets function the same as an expander mandrel to prevent tension loss over time.
Sinclair mandrels
OK, my experience here. Sinclair mandrels used to be more than just one per caliber, at least in 22 for 556 ammo neck tension tickiness (read Zedicker if you want more info there), I don't recall the special order process but it exists and the Zedicker sizes used to be a SO but on the shelf and...
www.longrangehunting.com