Pete Lincoln
Well-Known Member
having used both the MOA and the Mil system of range estimation, i much prefer the Mil system,
like has ben said, either will work, but it makes sense to use the mil system when ranging in meters and adjusting in 10ths or a mil on the scope.
Ive been working with S&B a fair bit and on the cards is an MOA reticle for use in thier MOA adjustable scopes.
It just so happens that a Miliradian corresponds nicely to the upper torsoe size of a mans body.
it also correcponds nicely to the 25cm depth of body of a roe deer. red are about twice that dept, also corresponding nicely.
pete
like has ben said, either will work, but it makes sense to use the mil system when ranging in meters and adjusting in 10ths or a mil on the scope.
Ive been working with S&B a fair bit and on the cards is an MOA reticle for use in thier MOA adjustable scopes.
It just so happens that a Miliradian corresponds nicely to the upper torsoe size of a mans body.
it also correcponds nicely to the 25cm depth of body of a roe deer. red are about twice that dept, also corresponding nicely.
pete
