I am thinking about Magnaporting my Weatherby.
The only thing that appeals to me is not having to forget or lose the brake and even more importantly not having to add an additional 2" to the end of the already long 26" tube.
Can someone describe the advantages and disadvantages of either ?
Is recoil reduction better with either?
The Magnaport is a nice looking addition to the barrel but it is not as effective as a brake
for many reasons.
It interrupts the rifling and reduces effective barrel length. also it has no chambers or baffles
to redirect the gasses and be more efficient.
Gasses simply escape out the ports and reduce the amount that goes out the muzzle reducing
recoil by a small percentage compared to a baffled brake.
If you add a large ported brake like the Holland quick discharge you will not reduce the effective
barrel barrel length but you will reduce the recoil by 40 to 50%.
I have used both and will not have another barrel magnaported because of the disadvantages
compared to the muzzle brakes.
The most effective muzzle brakes have been the one with chambers and long ports angling
backwards like the "fish Gill" on the 50 BMG giving the gasses something to push against
reducing backward thrust.
The magnaporting does not effect accuracy of the larger slower bullets like Magnum pistols
but in high velocity rifles the interrupted rifling is disruptive to the controlled engraving of the
bullet and has been known to make the bullet yaw if placed close to the muzzle.
As I said, In My opinion magnaporting offers nothing but looks, Everything else is negative
compared to no brake,or a well designed break.
I still have a few contenders and revolvers with Magnaported barrels but there will be no
more now that there are better options.
Just My opinion.
J E CUSTOM