Lots of People like to bash brands.

We've gotten very far afield from the OP's comment.

My apology to anyone I have offended.

I hope we can agree to disagree.
It's not about disagreeing. You made a lot of questions based off of something I never said making those questions Illogical. And if I tried to argue those questions when they have no base then my argument would be just as illogical because I'am not actually arguing anything that makes sense.
 
Hey will 16 just because you read it doesn't make it true either. I know you we joking and so am I. That's what this thread has turned into. 🤣
See I didn't forget the smiley this time.
Shep
No problem dude. I don't want my intentions Misinterpreted as an Appeal to authority. While it is true he used it, it's a Fallacy to base an argument off of just that. Hence my joke.
 
Test data saying that the Marine Corps uses other stuff besides Leupold?
well I cant provide any test data but I can tell you while in the corps I used a m-40A1 with a Unertl 10x and it always performed well while there was a few other optics in use I never used one
 
So........ Back to what I think this discussion was wanting to be about. I sent in a millet that came on a gun that I bought. Scope has a bent tube. Sent it in they identified the problem and returned the scope without fixing it. Offered to sell me another scope at a discounted price. (discount was crap as I could buy it cheaper at a few stores)

Scope was branded millet who is owned by Vista outdoors that also owns Bushnell. I have spoken with them twice about their repare policy. This is one case that I wish it was a Leupold or vortex. I have sworn off Bushnell /millett/vista. And will not buy from them again. Not because I don't like their products but because there are comparable quality and priced products on the market with better warranties.

I don't have the receipt but I had to return a leica spotter a couple years ago for a scratched front lense. They replaced it and charged me $500 for replacing a lense. That scope was immediately sold and my geovids will not be replaced by anything made by leica. Great glass /products but for the price there are comparable products on the market that have better warrantees. Leica will never get another $1 from me.
 

Attachments

  • 15877450352457401388912708517986.jpg
    15877450352457401388912708517986.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 70
well I cant provide any test data but I can tell you while in the corps I used a m-40A1 with a Unertl 10x and it always performed well while there was a few other optics in use I never used one
I don't think you get me. I'am not asking for data. I'am just stating a fact, that the USMC uses and likes other stuff besides Leupold.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top