Bashing things by faceless people on the internet who can never be held accountable is the way things are.
If you chose to believe them, that's up to you.
There are very few real experts on optics and they don't reside here.
You might consider that if Leupold were as bad as these keyboard warriors say, they would have gone the way of Yugo decades ago.
Both the Army and USMC use Leupold products, obviously they are idiots ---- right ?
Wow, you have been here almost 12 days and are calling members keyboard warriors, good job!
It is our job to decide if anything said, printed, or viewed is on the up and up, everything. I'm not one to publicly bash a product just because I am not a fan, I usually dump it at rock bottom pricing and move on. But if I choose to speak up, no different than anyone else, I will give my opinion. If anyone takes my advice, great, if not, that is great too. I do not need a receipt or a work order to know what went down either, and I do not have to supply it to give an opinion, ever.
I like Leupold as a company, said so in this post, but you saying they would have went the way of the Yugo if they were that bad. In the prs crowd, IMO, the largest scope market in the country right now, they almost have. They failed to innovate, keep up with the times, and it has bit them big time. The Mark 4 lost gold standard status over10 yrs ago. Their Mark 5 sits around 50-50, love-hate amongst owners.
And your comment that no optics experts reside here, looks like you will fit right in then, I doubt many of us will be taking scope advice from you after your last sentence.