Yeah, I goofed. I said rebated. Should have been rimmed. Sorry.I think someone needs to start a thread on the difference between rimmed, rimless and rebated.
Yeah, I goofed. I said rebated. Should have been rimmed. Sorry.I think someone needs to start a thread on the difference between rimmed, rimless and rebated.
You definitely have some differences between the 2 brands. IMI is growing g a lot at the base. Check the actual thickness of the rim if possible and I would suggest firing a few rounds in another gun. Maybe even a bolt gun where you can feel for lock-upHere are the measurements requested:
Cartridge base to shoulder distance (I cannot gaurantee the new ammo is from the same lot as the fired ammo):
Cartridge base diameter:
-IMI new: 0.466
-IMI fired: 0.471
-FGMM new: 0.468
-FGMM fired: 0.470
Overall case length:
-IMI fired: 2.012
-FGMM fired: 2.020
Groove diameter:
IMI fired: 0.406
-FGMM fired: 0.405
Rim diameter:
IMI fired: 0.470
-FGMM fired: 0.469
Unfortunately I only have a set of calipers, so I don't believe I have the tools to measure the distance from the shoulder to the base accurately. Also I was unsure if you were looking for diameter of the rim and groove, or length of the rim and groove. I listed diameters because that's the measurements I could accurately take.
For what it's worth, when I place the brass side by side on a level surface there is no perceptable difference between the two in terms of where the shoulder starts.
The Semi-Auto on the IMI box suggests that the OP is using it as intended. It is also labeled as Match grade ammo so I'm seriously doubting the machine gun possibility. I have never had a primer exit a case. I've seen where a reloader has used european primers, then switched back to american primers (in the same cases) and have the primers start to back out. But never exit the case. Perhaps there is a new dynamic involved with the semi-auto action that adds to pressure since my experience is with bolt and single shot rifles. I agree that the ripped case head is due to the extraction starting before the case is done expanding. What if carbon buildup is holding the case a microsecond longer thus the case head damage.The powder IMI uses may not be the right burn rate for an AR-10 rifle. i.e. if the powder has a slower burn rate it might be creating too high a pressure at the point of unlocking and extracting.
Did you buy this IMI ammo in one large batch, like 1000 or 5000 bulk? I'm wondering if its all from the same lot number or not.Hi all,
I have a Savage MSR 10 Long Range (AR-10 style platform) chambered in .308 which I have been very pleased with. I am not a handloader but I did decide to try out a wide variety of ammo in the rifle to see what it liked best. I settled on IMI systems 7.62mm Semi-Auto Match 168 gr Razor Core because it seemed to group the best. It was always my understanding that 7.62 x 54 mm was safe to fire in a .308 rifle.
I have been running this ammo for the past few years and have experienced some issues. Some rounds blow the primers out and I find the separated case and primer on the ground after the round has cycled. Some rounds the rifle rips the rim off the cartridge during the extraction and ejection. Neither of these occurances were consistent, but both would occur at least once every range trip. I thought the issue may have been related to overpressure in the gas system so I turned the adjustable gas block down to one notch above "not cycling". This has not fixed the issue.
I ran FGMM 168 gr .308 through the rifle last weekend and did not experience a single issue.
I have attached a picture of the IMI with ripped cartridge rim, and a picture of the FGMM from last weekend. Unfortunately I forgot to save any cartridges with blown primers to post. None of the rounds show any bulging or disfigurement aside from what has been noted.
I am looking for any information that will help me understand what the issue with the IMI ammo is and if it can be mitigated or if I need to stick to other ammo in the rifle.
Thanks for your help!View attachment 479547