• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Load development for ruger American 22-250

Can you elaborate I little more on the scope failures? Considering 22-250 recoil is virtually non existent. Not arguing with you at all. Genuinely interested.
Scopes are made to handle recoil that moves. Fastest way to kill a scope is butt the rifle up against something immovable and pull the trigger. You can get away with not strapping the gun in the sled and removing the weight and letting it slide on the bench, but a front rest and sandbag is ideal.

For your group size, adjust your seating depth but keep an eye on pressure and velocity.
 
My Ruger is an old 77 mark 2, beaver tail stock etc. It likes 55 gr. Nosler Ballistic tips and H414 with cci benchrest primers. Way back I started it long and touching and started backing off till the gun showed me what it liked. They would ramp up and chamber perfect but would not load in the internal magazine as designed by Ruger, I modified that part. My brass is turned and squared. My projectile starts out lined up center with the bore. Just sayin
This target was shot with a Hart rest, baby powder, and a rabbit ear bag,,, under duress from a Viet Nam Gunny pounding the bench telling me how bad he was going to kick my rear, Ha ha ha Dennis didnt bring his cotton to the gin x3. My wife beat us all with a perfect score & her 222.
1705835834366.jpeg
 
That's the reason I started with IMR 4350, that and the fact that I repeatedly saw it in stock on shelves at local stores. My little brothers 270 likes IMR 4350 as well so we had some on hand from the start.
You may want to reassess the IMR 4350 when temps get warmer. It possibly may be temp sensitive as I've read. It's not the same as H4350 from what I gather. I am also new to reloading. So verify for yourself.
 
I'm shooting off of a lead sled with a 35lb Olympic barbell weight in it. It's solid. I have no issue holding on target.
I agree with others that have said that he lead sled is a problem. I didn't say 'the problem', but I would abandon that as your support and put the rifle on a bipod and rear sand bang, not only do I think there is a chance things will improve for accuracy, but I bet your point of impact shifts a significant amount.
 
Late to the conversation but I agree with others on the powder. H380 has been the best powder for the 22-250 I have ever used. 38.0 grains and a 55 grain projectile has produced some of the best groups I have ever shot with mine. Hence H380- 38.0… pretty neat lol. I would take the .020 off the lands and forget about that honestly. I'm not sure how you measured your distance to the lands but I have found with most factory rifles, getting to .020 off the lands has the projectile **** near not in the case at all. The manufacturer almost always leaves more room to the rifling cause you never know what someone has bought for ammo and weights that they want to shoot. That being said, do some reading on twist rates, find a projectile that falls right in the middle of the lower side and higher side of your twist rate and start there. The Nosler reloading manual has been one of the best for me, they list the most accurate load tried and highlight it. Honestly I have started with those for quite a few rifles and have been extremely pleased with the outcome. Most other books do not show you the most accurate powder tested I have found although the more you get into loading the more of them you will want for other options at times.
The .020 off the lands comment I made, the reason I wouldn't worry too much about that is I have rifles like Rem 700's that love the projectile that close to the lands and others that won't group 3" at that seating depth. The Ruger American I have is one of those rifles that doesn't like the projectile that close. If you are measuring your cbto, buy some factory loads and start checking what they are loaded to. I think you will be mind blown when you see just how much difference there can be with seating depths. That being said I feel through my time behind the gun that seating depth is far more important than powder charge. Most manuals give you a seating depth suggestion, I'd also start with that and work your way from there. The only projectiles I ever really start at the .020 off the lands for load development are Berger's, if you do some research on Barnes it's usually the opposite way and so far off the lands it's bothersome but it's what they like most the time.
Best advice I could give you, buy a few boxes of factory ammo. Get some different weights and different brands. Go enjoy the rifle and put some rounds down range. Find the ammo it shoots best with and work from there in small increments on your own loads. Chronograph is 100 percent needed to see consistency. Best of luck and have fun
 
Depending on rifle/scope combination a 1 inch group might be as accurate as it gets, especially if it's set up for hunting. At bench rest matches I have never seen a shooter use a lead sled for what it's worth. As others has previously stated, a 1 in 10 twist is borderline for the 69 gr bullet, in other words some rifles might handle it and others won't. Welcome to reloading.
 
Hello guys, I'm a newbie to reloading and I'm trying to get some heavier bullets for my 22-250. All the factory ammo I can find is 55gr and with the 1:10 twist of the ruger American I'd like to shoot the 69gr sierra matchkings. Sierra says 1:10 or faster so I figured I was on the right track. I was able to find IMR 4350 on the shelves at most local stores so I'd really like to make that work.

I looked up sierras load data for 69gr mk's and it shows a range of 5 different powder charges, so I loaded 5 rnds of each charge and went shoot.

All once fired nosler brass fully prepped and sized, seated .020 off the lands. CCI large rifle BR primers.

So 35.3gr shot the best. 5rnds @ 100yds 1" group. I went up a grain and it looks like the group opened up. I went down a grain a still no improvement.

I've tried weighing the bullets for consistency, measuring all the brass for uniformity and still not getting better than a 1" group.

Is there something else I can do to improve my load or should I abandon the IMR 4350 and try another powder? Or a lighter bullet?
You may find this useful: 1:8T recommended
 

Attachments

  • 22-250-Rem-70gr-version-9-0.pdf
    711.7 KB · Views: 124
Hello guys, I'm a newbie to reloading and I'm trying to get some heavier bullets for my 22-250. All the factory ammo I can find is 55gr and with the 1:10 twist of the ruger American I'd like to shoot the 69gr sierra matchkings. Sierra says 1:10 or faster so I figured I was on the right track. I was able to find IMR 4350 on the shelves at most local stores so I'd really like to make that work.

I looked up sierras load data for 69gr mk's and it shows a range of 5 different powder charges, so I loaded 5 rnds of each charge and went shoot.

All once fired nosler brass fully prepped and sized, seated .020 off the lands. CCI large rifle BR primers.

So 35.3gr shot the best. 5rnds @ 100yds 1" group. I went up a grain and it looks like the group opened up. I went down a grain a still no improvement.

I've tried weighing the bullets for consistency, measuring all the brass for uniformity and still not getting better than a 1" group.

Is there something else I can do to improve my load or should I abandon the IMR 4350 and try another powder? Or a lighter bullet?

If this is gonna be used for varminting I have a suggestion that may seem silly at first given that you want to go heavier than 55.

53 grain VMAX or 53 grain VARMAGEDDON. These are both notably longer than typical 55 grain bullets, and absolutely will not stabilize in a 1:14 no matter how fast you push them: tried that in a 220 swift a while ago. 1:12 minimum, I bet your 1/10 makes them shoot lights out!

Higher bc than the typical 55s as well. .290-.300 g1 bc range. In conjunction with the speed you could get these to out of your .22-250 I bet you'd have a winner. IN FACT, the 69 matchking only has a listed g1 bc of around .31. And will be starting out MUCH slower.

Just some thoughts, take them for whatever they're worth to ya, and happy shooting! :)
 
Ditch the sled and the IMR 4350. There is a reason Hodgdon website lists 21of its powders and does not include IMR 4350. I would go to a faster burning powder along the lines of H380/IMR 4064.


^this. H380 has been relatively obtainable of late. 4064 was THE powder to beat in the .220 swift I mentioned earlier, similar case to bore ratios.
 
You didn't tell us about the details of your RA. I've got that caliber in the Ruger American Predator. Some of those RAs, especially the early runs, had their cheap stock pushing on the barrel. Towards the tip in weird ways. Ruger even improved the stock's internal construction to improve them after a bit. Mine is in an aftermark stock and it did make a difference.
I put mine in a Magpul stock and it is also a big improvement over the factory one.
 
53gr V-Maxs are hard to beat for varmints and accuracy, but if I were starting out I'd try those new 62 Gr Varmint bullets Hornady came out with and if you're wanting a bit heavier bullet that might be the way to go. Match Kings have a pretty tough jacket and not the best for killing things, they'll work but there's better bullets out there in abundance.
 

Recent Posts

Top