Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Lets settle this once and for all FFP or SFP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 3010205" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>I have both ffp sfp as well as mil and moa. The tacticool side of me likes ffp and mil so I can play sniper on a solo mission trekking the mountains. The reality is I use the ffp mil for prs where you engage multiple known distance targets under fast pace and generally on 15-18 power max. You dial a certain amount of elevation and hold the rest for each stage. For hunting long range I am almost always able and prefer to dial high power and hold wind but dial elevation. For closer shots I find sfp reticle to be preferred but even on closer shots I still tend to dial up a bit so the super small reticle issue isn't a big issue. Where I draw the line generally with people is when they argue about ffp ranging. It's not accurate enough to be reliable on killing animals. Using generic animal measurements is risky and for me, it's irresponsible to take that risk. If my lrf quits, I hunt closer (pbr). I've been there using sig 2400's. 3 of them quit while on hunting trips.</p><p></p><p>End of sorry for me…. It doesn't really matter and both work just fine. It's kind of a pointless agreement overall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 3010205, member: 61747"] I have both ffp sfp as well as mil and moa. The tacticool side of me likes ffp and mil so I can play sniper on a solo mission trekking the mountains. The reality is I use the ffp mil for prs where you engage multiple known distance targets under fast pace and generally on 15-18 power max. You dial a certain amount of elevation and hold the rest for each stage. For hunting long range I am almost always able and prefer to dial high power and hold wind but dial elevation. For closer shots I find sfp reticle to be preferred but even on closer shots I still tend to dial up a bit so the super small reticle issue isn't a big issue. Where I draw the line generally with people is when they argue about ffp ranging. It's not accurate enough to be reliable on killing animals. Using generic animal measurements is risky and for me, it's irresponsible to take that risk. If my lrf quits, I hunt closer (pbr). I've been there using sig 2400's. 3 of them quit while on hunting trips. End of sorry for me…. It doesn’t really matter and both work just fine. It’s kind of a pointless agreement overall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Lets settle this once and for all FFP or SFP
Top