Lapping Vortex 30mm precision match rings

There several contact surfaces that come into play, the receiver, rail if you use one and the rings themselves. I always carefully check the rail to receiver fit first with a really straight edge and often bed the rail to fit the receiver. I take some blue painters tape, cut out a small area to expose the mounting screw holes and just snug the rail. Then take an exacto knife and carefully cut the line around the base of the rail. Remove the rail and the center portion of the tape and you have a very clean line to protect the receiver from bedding compound or JB weld. Put a liberal amount of release agent on the receiver, rough the bottom portion of the rail which is high, clean it and apply you compound to the underside of the rail. I plug the screw holes (both receiver and rail) with clay putty, snug the screws on the opposite end which should squeeze out a bead around the bottom of the rail and clean the excess with a q-tip and a little acetone just on the surface of the rail. Let it cure, remove the rail, clean the hole and torque the rail to spec. Now you have a flat surface on which to check your rings and if they're not perfect, I do the same thing with the lower half of the rings. There's a good article on this site so I won't go into that.
 
I don't lap rings bc they may not fit the same on another action or rail if they get moved, necessitating lapping again. I bed both the rail and rings with a release agent so that I can move either without problem.
 
I'm in the process of building a new long distance rifle. I dont know whether or not to lap my new rings. As I said they are the Vortex 30mm precision match rings. I talked with Vortex and they said lapping is not necessary since the rings are made to such tight tolerances. I know the benefits of lapping, but I don't know to do it if it's not necessary. What are your guys' thoughts and do you have any experience with these rings?
I've used several sets of those rings on my match rifles and never thought they needed lapped.
 
I'm in the process of building a new long distance rifle. I dont know whether or not to lap my new rings. As I said they are the Vortex 30mm precision match rings. I talked with Vortex and they said lapping is not necessary since the rings are made to such tight tolerances. I know the benefits of lapping, but I don't know to do it if it's not necessary. What are your guys' thoughts and do you have any experience with these rings?
Bedding is a much better way to go. I have only had to lap one set of iota rings because the scope was an extremely tight fit a d I bedded them afterwards. Its easy a d cheap but gives the best grip a d fit.
 
I'm in the process of building a new long distance rifle. I dont know whether or not to lap my new rings. As I said they are the Vortex 30mm precision match rings. I talked with Vortex and they said lapping is not necessary since the rings are made to such tight tolerances. I know the benefits of lapping, but I don't know to do it if it's not necessary. What are your guys' thoughts and do you have any experience with these rings?
Considering they are made by Seekins , I'd say you're good to go. Glen has said on numerous occasions that his rings do not need to be lapped. I've never had a lick of trouble with any of my sets. Be sure to bed your rail to prevent any distortion that could be imparted to your scope.
 
I lap my rings lightly just as a check to see if everything is lining up right. I feel sorry for the scope manufacturers replacing scopes that we screw up due to over tightening, etc. I have two sets of those rings. Very nice. I also clean the rail and action with acetone and use devcon to adhere the rail to the action. It doesn't come off unless you add some heat which is perfect for me. Just my 1 cent.
 
The way I see it is this, do you bet on wheeler to have better machining and QC tolerances on a $50 piece of round bar stock than nightforce, seekins, leupold, etc put into their manufacturing process? Even before taking into account that a human is applying the lapping compound and subsequent pressure and motion inconsistently, I put my money on the reputable ring manufacturers. Not a knock on wheeler, I own plenty of their stuff, but not this particular set of tools. Like others have said, get a high quality rail and a good straight edge, get it mounted up and torqued, and run the smallest feeler gauge you have to check for bowing, etc.

Truth be told, I've totally stopped sweating this whole process and have been slowly converting everything to spuhr mounts as I find deals on them.
 
Kenny Jarrett started making his own actions 25+yrs ago because the factory actions used for his guns were no longer measured within tolerance. l personally know the number one problem was misaligned scope mounting holes in the receiver... lf the scope holes in the receiver aren't straight, nothing else will be straight
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top