A bit late but the Kokopelli scope alignment bars and lapping bars are very good.
yeah
I looked at their kit. Very high quality product but I am just more familiar with Sinclair.
A bit late but the Kokopelli scope alignment bars and lapping bars are very good.
So unless you want ring marks on your $2,328 scope I would suggest you lap. Pretty sure this guy knows what he's doing.
Len Backus
PUBLISHER
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 6,163
5-25x56 NF ATACR with MOAR-T reticle - NEW
2nd focal plane
the wheeler and sinclair lapping kits come with allignment bars. they help in telling if the rings are straight. I lap everything except my NF Direct mounts which is all one piece. I personally dont care about a warranty on a set of rings.. the only thing that will fail on a set of high dollar rings is maybe the screws and those are cheap. so to me the warranty is just a feel good thing for the consumer. Lap your rings and do it properly.
It's funny seeing Mike here commenting on his disregard for the warranty on rings. Mike sold me a set of Badger Ordnance rings through his classified ads that had been lapped and weren't listed as such.
When the rings arrived and I asked Mike for a refund since I didn't want Badger rings that had already been lapped and were void of the warranty he agreed to send me a refund when he could get the funds together. This was back in February, since then he's been buying toys here on the classifieds so I can only assume he isn't (wasn't) actually short on cash.
The last contact I had from Mike (2/26) was his promise to send me the refund soon, since then he won't answer my calls or pm's which leads me to believe he doesn't like lapped rings as much as his comments here would suggest.
If he recieved your money then he HAD the money to repay you....but evidently he PI&&&D is away before spending it properly. My condolences to you sir....got my fingers crosed for you
You know, his initial request to give him some time was perfectly acceptable if it had been true and the money was already spent, I didn't need the refund immediately. In fact, I didn't even send him a PM asking when I could expect the refund until over a month later on 4/2 and a second inquiry on 6/09 when I still hadn't even received a reply to the 4/2 PM (I still haven't received a reply to either).
In this thread he purchased a $625 scope on 5/19, demonstrating that money was not the real issue at hand.
http://www.longrangehunting.com/for...azor-gen-ii-2-pst-1-hs-lr-154290/#post1085258
I know he reads my messages, I sent him one only last week that he read, chose not to reply to, then went and visited my profile here on LRH, if you click my name you will see his name in the log of visitors.
As far as I can tell the man just thinks leading me on about actually sending a refund then ignoring me is the proper way to deal with this. His pm's offered no initial evidence of deception when I asked him for a refund, this is the last message I received from him on 2/26:
"I will accept return, however I dont have the money right now but if you can bare with me I will get it rounded up and send your money back. then when you have your money you can send them back. no hard feelings. I thought I had that they were lapped in the description so I appologize for that."
lightbulbI hope that Erin Gillespie and Tikkamike have their issue resolved soon.lightbulb
With high quality, fully machined rings, the straightness of the rail usually determines whether or not to lap. If the rail is well made and fits the receiver perfectly, the rings should be coaxial and should not need lapping. A perfect fit is possible, for example, if the rail is properly bedded, or if it's machined into the receiver.
On the other hand, accessory rails merely tightened onto a Rem 700 receiver are likely to have some twist and bend deformation. If you test the rings using a good steel ruler, you will often find that even high quality rings are not coaxial.
No need to lap with high quality rings. Torqued to spec, they'll serve you well.