Just two rifles...what calibers? varmints to bears

I was wrong about the .22lr, that is only available for the R93.

But all the other calibers are interchangeable using the bolt head from the categories; mini; standard; medium; magnum, with the .505 Jeffires and 10.3x60R Swiss having their own setups.
The 10.3x60R Swiss is there because in Switzerland they are only allowed to use this caliber for certain hunts, and I believe it must be single shot with open sights.
 
The 338WinMag is always a good choice, but in Europe I'd go for the 9,3x62, or even better the 8x68S for both LR and large game. For lighter game, hard terrain (Alpes etc.) and LR I'd choose a well proven 7mm cartridge. 7x64 or 7mmRM!
 
If no logistical issues exist. I take my .223, and my .338 RUM. Logistics being an issue the .223 is still in, but the second becomes a horse race , between the .308 Winchester, the 30-06. and the .300 Winchester Magnum. Depending on how many questions I get to ask about why I'm in this position of emptying my safe.

As it's not a rifle my Benelli M4 also comes with.:D
 
I am dead set now on the calibers, it's time I gave a better explanation of the the reasons behind my choices.

.338 win mag - fluted semi weight 23" barrel - The idea here is that the "big gun" doubles as my long range heavy and my normal bigger game hunting rifle. The .338 will have two scopes, and two loads.
A Kahles K624i for shooting the 300 grain VLDs, on steel, and on game out to 1000 yards.
Then the hunting load consisting of a 225 Partition or TSX or something similar which will be paired with a Swarovski Z61.7-10x42i with stadia lines. This way I have a scope for use in driven hunts, and hunts where long shots beyond the reach of the stadia marks aren't needed or likely. This is, in reality most of my hunting. I would use this for hunting big pigs, or red deer, on driven hunts, or on an Alaskan hunt, and maybe even a mountain hunt where I thought there would be the need for a very long shot.

Then the 6.5x55 because they don't offer the 6.5-284 anymore, but I can always rechamber. This will wear a Leupold Mk 4 6-5-20 or a Vortex 4-16 HS-T and probaly shoot 130 or 140 Berger hunting VLDs. It will probably do the majority of the hunting where I hunt most, for fallow and roe deer, pigs and the occasional fox, as well as most of the mountain hunting chamois in the Alps, because it will have a standard weight 23" fluted barrel and a light scope.

Both are proven hunting and long range calibers, the .338 win mag isn't a thouroughbred long range cartridge, but the reality is that even though I have a range out to 1300 yards, and a few spots where I have poked out to 1940 yards, when hunting, I can only dependably make shots out to about maybe eight hundred yards. Which is fine and I still have room to grow.

I see the two as being far enough apart and having minimal overlap, but both being able to replace each other in a pinch, so neither is redundant.

I am also looking at the new NeoPod ultralight bipod to pair with both, I have both the Atlas and the Harris, and can't decide with one is better. I think the Atlas could be improved if they just changed the angles the legs can be set at.

The problem lies with chosing the safari barrel, which I was going to get in .458 Lott, but I love the .375 H&H and there is the legal requirement which puts it as the minimum caliber for dangerous game. It's just too close to the .338 to feel like a sensible choice, however I have a double rifle that covers the heavy hitting "stopper" category, so I could just get a .375 H&H and be done with it.
The safari barrel also uses the Swarovski scope, since I dont need that rifle to be ready to hunt all the time.

I'm looking at putting 11 rifles (all different calibers) and a handgun up to trade against these three barrels, so my life will be quite a bit simpler after this. I don't have the time anymore to reload for a heap of cartridges, or shoot the rifles I am selling/trading.

So that's it, this feels like a bit of a turning point in my shooting/hunting life, I hope I am making the right decision.
 
I am dead set now on the calibers, it's time I gave a better explanation of the the reasons behind my choices.

.338 win mag - fluted semi weight 23" barrel - The idea here is that the "big gun" doubles as my long range heavy and my normal bigger game hunting rifle. The .338 will have two scopes, and two loads.
A Kahles K624i for shooting the 300 grain VLDs, on steel, and on game out to 1000 yards.
Then the hunting load consisting of a 225 Partition or TSX or something similar which will be paired with a Swarovski Z61.7-10x42i with stadia lines. This way I have a scope for use in driven hunts, and hunts where long shots beyond the reach of the stadia marks aren't needed or likely. This is, in reality most of my hunting. I would use this for hunting big pigs, or red deer, on driven hunts, or on an Alaskan hunt, and maybe even a mountain hunt where I thought there would be the need for a very long shot.

Then the 6.5x55 because they don't offer the 6.5-284 anymore, but I can always rechamber. This will wear a Leupold Mk 4 6-5-20 or a Vortex 4-16 HS-T and probaly shoot 130 or 140 Berger hunting VLDs. It will probably do the majority of the hunting where I hunt most, for fallow and roe deer, pigs and the occasional fox, as well as most of the mountain hunting chamois in the Alps, because it will have a standard weight 23" fluted barrel and a light scope.

Both are proven hunting and long range calibers, the .338 win mag isn't a thouroughbred long range cartridge, but the reality is that even though I have a range out to 1300 yards, and a few spots where I have poked out to 1940 yards, when hunting, I can only dependably make shots out to about maybe eight hundred yards. Which is fine and I still have room to grow.

I see the two as being far enough apart and having minimal overlap, but both being able to replace each other in a pinch, so neither is redundant.

I am also looking at the new NeoPod ultralight bipod to pair with both, I have both the Atlas and the Harris, and can't decide with one is better. I think the Atlas could be improved if they just changed the angles the legs can be set at.

The problem lies with chosing the safari barrel, which I was going to get in .458 Lott, but I love the .375 H&H and there is the legal requirement which puts it as the minimum caliber for dangerous game. It's just too close to the .338 to feel like a sensible choice, however I have a double rifle that covers the heavy hitting "stopper" category, so I could just get a .375 H&H and be done with it.
The safari barrel also uses the Swarovski scope, since I dont need that rifle to be ready to hunt all the time.

I'm looking at putting 11 rifles (all different calibers) and a handgun up to trade against these three barrels, so my life will be quite a bit simpler after this. I don't have the time anymore to reload for a heap of cartridges, or shoot the rifles I am selling/trading.

So that's it, this feels like a bit of a turning point in my shooting/hunting life, I hope I am making the right decision.

I do not own a 338 win but id think lobbing 300 grainer VLDs out to 1000 yards on game not such a good idea. The bullet would be going pretty dang slow. 250 grains would probably be more optimal or go with a faster 338RUM or lapua for those distances. Most would say 338 win inside 600-700yards...
 
I do not own a 338 win but id think lobbing 300 grainer VLDs out to 1000 yards on game not such a good idea. The bullet would be going pretty dang slow. 250 grains would probably be more optimal or go with a faster 338RUM or lapua for those distances. Most would say 338 win inside 600-700yards...

Not a .338 fan, but I agree with this assessment. Going for mid-to-long ranges, I'd go with a .338 RUM over the .338 WM.
 
Maybe I'm missing something again, but a .300 win mag should push a 210gn SMK around 2800, which, compared to the theoretical ballistics for the .338 300gn SMK starting at a measly 2450fps, they end up within 60fps of each other at 1000 yards, but the 300 grainier obviously carries a full 50% more energy.

The figures:

.300 win mag 210gn SMK @ 2800 at 1000 yrds 1545fps - 1111 ft/lbs
.338 win mag 300gn SMK @ 2450 at 1000 yrds 1485fps - 1466 ft/lbs
.308 win 180gn VLD @ 2600 at 1000 yrds 1274fps - 666 ft/lbs

Am I sourcing my info from the wrong place?? (FTE ballistics AE app)

The .338 RUM isn't available in the Blasers, and this isn't supposed to be an all out thoroughbred log range rig. It's supposed to be a big game hunting rifle that I shoot steel out to and beyond 1000, and occasionally game to around 800-900 max.
 
Maybe I'm missing something again, but a .300 win mag should push a 210gn SMK around 2800, which, compared to the theoretical ballistics for the .338 300gn SMK starting at a measly 2450fps, they end up within 60fps of each other at 1000 yards, but the 300 grainier obviously carries a full 50% more energy.

The figures:

.300 win mag 210gn SMK @ 2800 at 1000 yrds 1545fps - 1111 ft/lbs
.338 win mag 300gn SMK @ 2450 at 1000 yrds 1485fps - 1466 ft/lbs
.308 win 180gn VLD @ 2600 at 1000 yrds 1274fps - 666 ft/lbs

Am I sourcing my info from the wrong place?? (FTE ballistics AE app)

The .338 RUM isn't available in the Blasers, and this isn't supposed to be an all out thoroughbred log range rig. It's supposed to be a big game hunting rifle that I shoot steel out to and beyond 1000, and occasionally game to around 800-900 max.
I still doubt you'll be doing much effective or efficient +1000 shooting with a .338 WinMag, but it's your money. If you plan on going +1000, I strongly suggest a larger capacity caliber.

Whatever... It's your money.

But If confirmation is all you were after, you should have said so in the first place...And not asked for suggestions.
 
The 338 win is only 200 fps or so slower than the lapua or rum with 250's or 225's; you may see up to 300 fps less on 300's. That said, the only critter I killed with my 338 was a deer at 550 using the hdy 225 sp (a .400 bc bullet) and it only took about a two body height hold over.
I've been working with my 338 win with 285gr hdy hpbt bullets. For the 285's to be accurate in my rifle I have to be over pressure enough that the primer pockets are getting damaged; I will not run a rifle this way (even a #1 which will take over 100 Kpsi) so I have gone back to 225's and 250's. I suspect the 300gr bullets would be as bad or worse, so I'll not be working with those unless I luck out with another powder using the few 285gr bullets I have left.
 
I still doubt you'll be doing much effective or efficient +1000 shooting with a .338 WinMag, but it's your money. If you plan on going +1000, I strongly suggest a larger capacity caliber.

Whatever... It's your money.

But If confirmation is all you were after, you should have said so in the first place...And not asked for suggestions.

Sorry if I seems like I'm being stubborn and not taking into account the suggestions, the reason for that is mostly because about 80% of them are for calibers that are not listed in the link I provided in the original post.

The difficulties of getting gunsmith work done is the whole reason I wanted to go with Blaser, so rechambering a factory offering, while possible, is something I'd like to try and avoid.

If I could easily rechamber, I would probably go for a .338 Norma, which has been a caliber I really like for a long time, but then, if I could easily get gunsmith work done, without having to wait a year, or two, and pay the same as what a Blaser costs, then I would have done that years ago.
 
Top