For $99 more - https://www.eurooptic.com/Burris-Xt...3-18x50mm-34mm-SCR-MOA-Riflescope-201203.aspx
If considering XTRII, XTRIII is a definite step up.
If considering XTRII, XTRIII is a definite step up.
That is not at all what I am saying. Definitely not belittling anyone, unless they make stupid comments...What do you not like specifically about the Vortex Viper PST Gen 2 3-15x?
The Burris XTR II 5-25x didn't like my vision…..my vision is clear, but the scope is not so…
Nevermind. Some people have a budget….thats ok. No reason to belittle folks for not buying a $4000 optic….
He's saying only $4000 scopes are good enough to work….but then he won't give his Zero Comp to Form to "test" it!
SWFA 3-15x is not a bad choice.
Maybe I came out a little chippy. I always see you promote the ultra high end stuff and then get a bit snarky with us low enders. I hope $4000 scopes are great. Best optic I've been behind is a Nightforce ATACR. I wasn't fond of the reticle and it really didn't stand out from my Tract optically. The Tract has better turrets IMO. I don't see ZCO in the world where I shoot. I'm sure they are fine, but without comparative testing that I can see the methods used, I have no interest in squirreling away $4000. Do I have it? Sure. It is being spent elsewhere.That is not at all what I am saying. Definitely not belittling anyone, unless they make stupid comments...
I have NEVER said you need a $3k+ scope to work. Apparently humor has escaped you. I think most people on here that know me, got the joke. And know my reputation for suggesting the absolute best when they don't give a budget...hence the gif of refraining from a suggestion.
And who ever asked to test my ZCO? Not that I would send it anywhere, because I actually shoot year round. Shot both my ZCOs in the last 2 weeks.
Yep, I saw the humor!That is not at all what I am saying. Definitely not belittling anyone, unless they make stupid comments...
I have NEVER said you need a $3k+ scope to work. Apparently humor has escaped you. I think most people on here that know me, got the joke. And know my reputation for suggesting the absolute best when they don't give a budget...hence the gif of refraining from a suggestion.
And who ever asked to test my ZCO? Not that I would send it anywhere, because I actually shoot year round. Shot both my ZCOs in the last 2 weeks.
You want to show me where I "get a bit snarky with low-enders"? I mostly stay out of the budget scope threads, because I don't have a ton of time behind many sub-$700 scopes anymore. They are just not in the range I shoot anymore. I had plenty of low end scopes from $120-700 in the past...hence why they are in my past. I have just advanced beyond those types of optics for numerous reasons.Maybe I came out a little chippy. I always see you promote the ultra high end stuff and then get a bit snarky with us low enders. I hope $4000 scopes are great. Best optic I've been behind is a Nightforce ATACR. I wasn't fond of the reticle and it really didn't stand out from my Tract optically. The Tract has better turrets IMO. I don't see ZCO in the world where I shoot. I'm sure they are fine, but without comparative testing that I can see the methods used, I have no interest in squirreling away $4000. Do I have it? Sure. It is being spent elsewhere.
Back to the OP. Convince me he cannot solve his issue for $800.