So my husband sent me this string, and I had to register before I could comment. I know this is a little late, but if your wife has a rifle that she can at least shoot decently and is not a pipsqueak she should take hers instead of struggling with your ill-fitting rifle. A .270 and up is fine for elk, and I know a number of people who use and are successful with .243s, but of course shot placement and not too long a shot are important when at more marginal calibers. That would be the quickest fix. But after this hunt, get her a rifle that fits
her. There has been a lot of good input here.
Trying to share a rifle unless it is with your twin, simply does not work well.
But here is the problem, aside from trying to use a rifle set up custom for someone else. Eye relief. Whether it is too great or not enough you get black circles, blackouts, part black, problems with parallax, and loss of accuracy. Yeah, I am not a six footer, but years ago, when I was struggling to run my bolt with my rifle on my shoulder, and crawling the stock to even
see out of my 4X scope, I took a drastic measure. I took my chopbox to my stock. Shorter length of pull made a huge difference. Suddenly I got smaller groups, the felt recoil was less, I didn't get a stiff neck after shooting, and I could work the bolt to more quickly hit the "charging buffalo milk jugs". Nobody large had better every shoot my .338 though! My 6 foot 4 inch nephew had the opposite problem with his setup when he arrived here for a deer hunt. Blackout, black edges, etc.. Moving the scope
forward to give him proper eye relief fixed that problem and he went on to get a nice buck.
Fit is it. Another issue, the photos of you both sitting at the dining room table really don't show nearly enough about how either of you holds a rifle. Surely your left hand is not where you have it when shooting from a field position. And your wife's position does not look at all relaxed or even what she probably does when shooting. But if she really does have to raise her head up like that to see through the scope, of course she can't get a decent cheek weld or a consistent one. How high are those rings and bases anyway? And despite her size, she almost looks like she is crawling up to the scope to see out of it.
Over time, I have found a lot of combs that don't work for me, some have hurt me, and I have a collection of old M77 Rugers for just that reason. That specific comb height and low bases allows me to see through the scope without
straining to do so. Also true for other women I know with similar short faces (forehead to chin distance). Adding a riser can help with that, and if it works is a simple non-permanent fix on a stock. Straining leads to inconsistency and thus inaccuracy. And by the way, once the stock length is correct and I can get the butt where it belongs, my female anatomy is not in the way of the heel of the stock.
Most of the current crop of ladies' rifles are actually downsized, which I am pretty sure a 6 foot slender woman does not need. It could be worth a look, but the length of the setup may need to allow her to get the scope farther away from her rather than closer. Normally I would be counseling most of my women friends to try a shorter stock of a youth or ladies' rifle but not necessarily here.
If you put stock crawling together with too low a comb, and high bases, and add too much forend weight for a slender lady to hold up, you are looking for a lot of frustration. Your rifle must have a bipod since neither of you seemed to be holding on to the forend, but that would just make it all that heavier if shooting from a less than optimum field position.
I hope you guys can get something working. This should be a fun trip and a great adventure. Elk hunting is something that once it gets in the blood never leaves. Even as we get more decrepit
. There is nothing quite like elk country in the fall!