Since you want to work with Retumbo and it is the powder I have had best results with I will list some of those for you.
With the 300 SMK the best load I have found is 94.5 grains Retumbo with a fed 215. My 26" rem 700 shoots that load 2780 fps, 28" Pac-Nor=2825 fps, 30" Hart= 2880 fps.
The 285 Hornady I have only shot out of my 26" remington. 96 grains retumbo shoots 2865 fps.
With the 250's 98 grains retumbo shoots really well at 3140 fps out of my 26" remington. Out of the 28" pac-nor they averaged 3175 and the 30" Hart 3210 fps. These are max loads so if you try them work up in your rifle because different chambers and seating depths can drastically change pressures when you are working right at max.
Understand that I built many rifles and kept the fastest barrels in my collection. These are loads out of just three rifles. I can give you averages out of several when I tested the 338 RUM and 338-300 RUM head to head when the 338 RUM first came out. So like anything you read where a guy is getting 2925 fps with a 300 grainer which is way on the high side for the 338-300 and the 338 RUM there are just as many getting 2775 fps with the same load. It just depends on the individual barrel and chamber. So that is why in the first post I gave you a range of what you can expect and 99% of the rifles will fit in that range safely.
Thanks LTLR, that is exactly the kind of information I'm looking for, all consolidated into 1 thread. Absolutely perfect!
185g speed-
200g speed-
215g speed-
225g speed- 101g Retumbo 3350fps
250g speed- 98g Retumbo- 26" 3149, 28" 3175, 30" 3210
275g speed-
285g speed- 96g Retumbo- 26" 2865
300g speed- 94.5g Retumbo Fed215- 26" 2780, 28" 2825, 30" 2880
It's great to compare others load data as a reference ,but just keep in mind that others data could be over max and too hot in your rifle. Everyones barrels are different along with, bore and chamber specs. What matters is what your rifle will shoot the best and safely. I really like 90.0 grs of RL 25 pushing a 300 gr SMK, I had a lower ES and better velocity than H1000 and retumbo. I have also had a big issue with lot to lot consistency with H1000 and retumbo. I have not had these troubles with RL25. I have had loads with H1000 that had to be changed up to 4 grs changing lots of powder. To me that is completely unacceptable.
Yeah, this is just for reference and I'm just trying to get some real world numbers for apples to apples ballistic comparison, rather than relying on manufacturer "lawyer safe" numbers. It would be good also to do the same thing with "real world" numbers using other powders also, but Retumbo will be my powder unless I don't have favorable results.
I guess I must state as you guys already have, for those new to reloading,
don't start with these loads as they may blow your face off! Start several grains lower and work your way up. Also, there's no telling precisely where YOUR accuracy nodes will be without working up so it's pointless to start here anyway. These numbers are just representative of what is possible and what people have found with their respective guns.