bigngreen
Well-Known Member
Look at the pic with the bases flush against against each other, same length, I'll walk back out and see if I can get a repeatable measurement.Measure the length of the stems
Look at the pic with the bases flush against against each other, same length, I'll walk back out and see if I can get a repeatable measurement.Measure the length of the stems
Yes, I have the same pack of tips and installation block that was sent with them.I am in no way saying you are wrong here. So don't take it that way. But if they were intended to be used with the tips only. Why wouldn't they say anything about it? I'd think they would say, be sure to install the tips before shooting somewhere on the bag or the box. They even sent a nice little installer with them lol. If I shoot them I will put them in. Thanks for the info, I just ordered them to see if the accuracy and speed hype lives up to its name.
Look at the pic with the bases flush against against each other, same length, I'll walk back out and see if I can get a repeatable measurement.
It's just the pic and lighting, I tried to get it all lined up perfect so the pic was representing it correctly but just wasn't happening, all the pics looked odd vs with your eye.Is it just me or does the actual bullet look different? Length, ogive shape and definitely the color of the copper is different
I've seen some comparative tests from @fordy in video format, done on animals. You can definitely see a difference. Too bad you can't upload videos on here easily.Seems like a series of gel tests at different velocities would help show issues, yes?
It would give you comparative data, you have to go shoot a sample size of game animals to compare to the gel. Also you'd have to shoot long range not just down load which messes up rotational speed at impact throwing off things. At this point the larger body of data data seems to see the same things happening as it did before, issues seems localized.Seems like a series of gel tests at different velocities would help show issues, yes?
Go old school, tightly wound stacks of dry phone booksSeems like a series of gel tests at different velocities would help show issues, yes?
Videos are in the worksI've seen some comparative tests from @fordy in video format, done on animals. You can definitely see a difference. Too bad you can't upload videos on here easily.
You can get a similar effect of long range with a short barrel and fast twist barrel. For example, for certain 30cal tests, you could use a really short barreled 300 Blackout and a 1:6 twist or faster barrel to get low MV but still a high RPM. I've done it.It would give you comparative data, you have to go shoot a sample size of game animals to compare to the gel. Also you'd have to shoot long range not just down load which messes up rotational speed at impact throwing off things. At this point the larger body of data data seems to see the same things happening as it did before, issues seems localized.
IIRC, some are using 1:3' in 8.6 BO.You can get a similar effect of long range with a short barrel and fast twist barrel. For example, for certain 30cal tests, you could use a really short barreled 300 Blackout and a 1:6 twist or faster barrel to get low MV but still a high RPM. I've done it.
Gday Adam on this post of yours Sorry to put the emoji up as it may have confused so hopefully this explainsIs it just me or does the actual bullet look different? Length, ogive shape and definitely the color of the copper is different