Yep I get that. That wasn't my point though.I have no idea what caused the issue and I'm certainly not on a trip with any specific destination I need to arrive at. Simply trying to ascertain what might be the cause....but yes, Hammer states the minimum twist rate for each projectile for terminal performance.....and that's why I'm inquiring.
Do you know of other bullets from other companies that stress minimum twist rates the same way in order to produce acceptable terminal performance?
I'm not talking about simply advertising a minimum twist rate, because they all do that. I mean do they stress it as a limiting factor in order for the bullet to actually work properly terminally?
I'm not dogging on anyone or any company either. I think it's a valid point and concern. And I also agree terminal stability is indeed a thing and twist rate (bullet RPM) plays a part. I just wonder if it's a good thing for a bullet to be so sensitive and temperamental to it is all. Perhaps a better bullet would be less sensitive and temperamental to it, yes? As a bullet manufacture, that's the sort of thing I'd be striving for to make a better pill.