I tried 169g and 177g HH bullets out of a new 28 Nosler. The 169g shot a .58" group at 100 yds first five shots at 3287 fps so I was happy with that. After reading alot of posts on here most people seem to like the 143g. I also contacted Hammer and they also suggested the 143g on antelope to elk sized game. Of course I asked these questions after I decided on the 169.
Is there a much better terminal performance with the 143g over the 169g? And if there is in what circumstances would someone choose the 169 over the 143? If there is none why offer the 169?
Is there a much better terminal performance with the 143g over the 169g? And if there is in what circumstances would someone choose the 169 over the 143? If there is none why offer the 169?