Gunwerks… Magnus or Clymer (stock or rifle)

[03USMC]

Looking for some input on the two

Looking at a lightweight rig, but hearing the Magnus stock adds 12-16 ozs on the same barreled action.

So why get the Magnus stock over let's say the Clymer stock? I have a Clymer stock and love it… so I'm trying to be convinced that a Magnus stock is worth the weight penalty.

Thanks

 

[nwmnbowhunter]

It ain't

 

[onpoint]

It ain't

He isn't lying!!!!!

 

[03USMC]

He isn't lying!!!!!

Then do tell sir lol

 

[nwmnbowhunter]

You have a stock that you love that fits and it shoots good... what more do you want

 

[onpoint]

You have a stock that you love that fits and it shoots good... what more do you want

The magnus is not that much heavier than the clymr. They are similar stocks just the magnus is a little larger footprint.

 

[03USMC]

The magnus is not that much heavier than the clymr. They are similar stocks just the magnus is a little larger footprint.

From what I read it's 12-16 ozs more. Not true?

 

[onpoint]

I would guess at 6oz. Ask Aaron he's on here.

 

[Elk Hunter 338]

I really like both of the Clymer and Magnus stocks but "lightweight" for what they are, they are not as light as they should be. I don't think they were designed with that being the end goal.

They both have chassis in them if they could cut those out it would save a little weight.

I have an adjustable magnus here and it weighs 3.4 pounds vs. a fully painted and bedded manners LRH at 2.4 pounds

 

[onpoint]

I have a SA clymr that weighs 27.25oz. It's the new style build. That's with aluminum chassis. 14" lop

 

[Marky_mark]

I like my magnus a little more that my lrh. They are both very nice though. A few ounces isnt going to make or break anything, theres other places where you can cut weight

 

[03USMC]

Thanks gents

 

[Kimber7man]

@AaronSkipDavidson