Mike could have stated what you just stated, had he wanted. Unlike you, I don't know the mind of Mike. He didn't, for whatever reason. Yet you felt the need to state it on Mike's behalf? How does that work? You know the mind of Mike and express the mind of Mike on his behalf? Are you more qualified than Mike, or simply a cheerleader?
I suspect the only thing the member that purchased the item from Mike wanted, was the same thing you state Mike wanted from Graf & Sons... what he paid for. By the member's/purchaser's own account, Mike hasn't provided what he paid for. So, what's due Mike and good for Mike isn't good for the folk that purchase from Mike? Is that the logic your communicating on behalf of Mike.
Most will see the hypocrisy of Mike opening firing on Graf & Sons for their failure to satisfy, and then failing similarly himself, based on least one sale to a fellow member. Who do you think has more sales? Graf & Sons or Mike? By your own logic, Graf & Sons had a little issue with one sale (to Mike) out of millions of sales, and Mike felt the need to bring it up on this Forum? Shouldn't you be critical of Mike, the same as you're critical of me bringing up Mike's failure to satisfy the buyer in his transaction?
Could you explain again what it is that I felt the need to do, that Mike hadn't already done? Mike created this Thread to notify the membership of Graf & Sons' failure to satisfy on one itsy bitsy purchase (out of their millions of sales) and you support him. I post a link to a member's Thread critical of Mike's transaction/sale. Mike's thread/statement is stellar, yet mine is retarded.
At least Mike has the option to return the items to Graf & Sons and get his funds returned. No such luck to date for the member that purchased the scope rings from Mike.
Notice I haven't claimed your statements are retarded. I wouldn't do that, because it could be interpreted to mean that I'd be implying something directly about you. Your statements are convoluted, inconsistent, and biased to support your desired end point. Tikkamike criticizes a seller and he's a stellar guy in your book. I point out the fact that Mike's got his own problem accurately describing an item he sold, and satisfying a buyer, and I'm... well - something less than stellar.
You wanna start over again? I'll give you a false start...
