The question is not global warming or global cooling as they are calling for now. Both of those are cyclic and have been going on for thousands of years. They obviously are caused by many things long before we could have possibly had man made effects.
The issue is calling them "manmade" and trying to implement a bunch of stupid regs that cost trillions that are ineffective and lose any possible effects the first volcano fart.
Lastly, if it is true science, then throw ALL the data out, to all the scientists AND if they agree it is proof of the hypothis. If you hide data, hire a group of global warming cultists who write papers and peer review them only amongst themselves and the EPA refuses to release the information, then that is outright fraud and should be prosecuted.
The issue is calling them "manmade" and trying to implement a bunch of stupid regs that cost trillions that are ineffective and lose any possible effects the first volcano fart.
Lastly, if it is true science, then throw ALL the data out, to all the scientists AND if they agree it is proof of the hypothis. If you hide data, hire a group of global warming cultists who write papers and peer review them only amongst themselves and the EPA refuses to release the information, then that is outright fraud and should be prosecuted.