Trouble maker. lol.
You are worse than me,
if anyone at the range asks me what my chronograph is I tell them it's a turbo booster... then I wait for it.
LL! I like experiments, especially when inquiring minds wants to know.
Trouble maker. lol.
You are worse than me,
if anyone at the range asks me what my chronograph is I tell them it's a turbo booster... then I wait for it.
Muzzle brakes cause less recoil...therefore muzzle brakes make rifles slower...muzzle brakes are bad!!
Yep. If you weigh 500 lbs you will only need a .223 to hunt elk. The added velocity turns it into a .270. I am eating 10,000 calories a day, and not exercising so I can up the power on all my rifles.
Basic physics. There's a given amount of force created when the powder ignites. Some of that will be used to push the gun back, some to push the bullet forward. The less the gun is allowed to move, the more of that force remains to push the bullet.
Again, it's not enough to make any significant difference that I can see but the physics is sound.
? Muzzle brakes operate after the bullet leaves the muzzle. They have no effect whatever on the bullet, recoil, or velocity. Less recoil movement makes bullets travel faster, not slower, owing to conservation of energy. Abundant non-sequiturs here.
That's great !! All we have to do to get magnum performance is to shoot everything from the prone position.
Now I will have to try and test this theory. If i get the same results i will post it. Don,t see how it makes any difference like Mud said, because the bullet has left before there is any rifle movement.
"BUT" this would also mean that a muzzle brake can add velocity to your rifle.
If he is jetting a different velocity, I would think it has more to do with the Doppler signal coming back (Reflecting) differently at ground level than bench level. I have seen velocities changed from muzzle blast with and without a blast shield in front of the screens of a chronograph.
So I will try it with a Magneto Speed, where the first thing the chronograph sees is the bullet.
I personally wont believe it until I see it.
Just Me
J E CUSTOM
Right - I should have been clearer when I said recoil; I meant recoil before the bullet leaves the muzzle. Actually, I wonder if the diverting effect of the brake could make a bullet slower - I've never seen any study done of the effect of the "push" from muzzle gas jet force against the base of the bullet. It is moving faster than the bullet, and has solids as well as gas within it. It accelerates like mad once the bullet is out of the way.Recoil also happens after the bullet leaves the muzzle...hence me being facetious about muzzle brakes making bullets slower...
A Magneto Speed would be unusable for this test, because it moves with the rifle. It would show no difference whatsoever. The only chronograph that would show a change resulting from rifle movement would be one decoupled from the movement of the rifle - i.e. a ground-mounted one.I can't believe I am commenting on this before I try to test this "theory"
But some interesting comments have came from it.
I prefer the practical application to any problem or theory.
The equal and opposite reaction is true and not theory, "But" Equal is the catch 22. The average rifle weighs 8 pounds (56,000 grains) plus the mass of the shooter. A 150 grain bullet is many times lighter. (To early to do the math before coffee) The bullet velocity will be many, many times faster than the rifle velocity and the shooters shoulder in the opposite direction. So in reality the rifle doesn't move/recoil measurably before the bullet will exits the barrel. (This is the reason
a muzzle brake must have .005 to .010 thousandths clearance all round for the bullet to pass through without touching anything.
I have never tried less than .005 thousandths for clearance so I realy cant say if it moves at all before the bullet exits.
So if we get less than 1 or 2 thousandths movement of the rifle, it doesn't make sense that velocity would change in any position. And I am not willing to restrain a rifle by placing it against a brick wall and firing it to find out.
If there is a difference in velocity, why would it not change from a lead sled to a shoulder shot. The Magneto Speed would be perfect for this test because it attaches to the rifle and moves with it.
I still think it is from ground effects from shock waves effecting the chronograph Just like the shock wave off the ground/floor that shows up in this video.
https://www.longrangehunting.com/threads/bullet-shock-wave.211219/
It is interesting to talk about this theory, but I just cant believe that the position can effect velocity that much if any.
J E CUSTOM
I can't seem to edit the misspell of movement - I keep getting an error that says that my comment contains spam. ? Edit; tried a few hours later and the edit went through; but there's no option to delete this post.A Magneto Speed would be unusable for this test, because it moves with the rifle. It would show no difference whatsoever. The only chronograph that would show a change resulting from rifle movement would be one decoupled from the moverment of the rifle - i.e. a ground-mounted one.
A Magneto Speed would be unusable for this test, because it moves with the rifle. It would show no difference whatsoever. The only chronograph that would show a change resulting from rifle movement would be one decoupled from the moverment of the rifle - i.e. a ground-mounted one.
I don't follow. If you are trying to measure the velocity of the bullet relative to the muzzle, you have to have a reference frame. If the reference frame is moving with the gun, then it will show no change. For example, if a ground-mounted chronograph were moving towards the gun, it would show a higher muzzle velocity than if it were stationary. If you are trying to show that muzzle velocity decreases (relative to a fixed plane) when the gun recoils, you need a fixed plane to measure it against. The Magneto Speed is moving back with the gun. If it were moving back at 1,000 f/s, it would still show the same muzzle velocity, because the frame of reference is moving at 1,000 f/s.Thats why the MS would work. MV is MV.
I don't follow. If you are trying to measure the velocity of the bullet relative to the muzzle, you have to have a reference frame. If the reference frame is moving with the gun, then it will show no change. For example, if a ground-mounted chronograph were moving towards the gun, it would show a higher muzzle velocity than if it were stationary. If you are trying to show that muzzle velocity decreases (relative to a fixed plane) when the gun recoils, you need a fixed plane to measure it against. The Magneto Speed is moving back with the gun. If it were moving back at 1,000 f/s, it would still show the same muzzle velocity, because the frame of reference is moving at 1,000 f/s.
Edit: I didn't do a great job above; here's the thought experiment. The gun has infinite mass, so it doesn't move. The Magneto Speed doesn't either. It records the velocity of the bullet relative to the muzzle, AND to the reference plane perpendicular to the ground. Next, the gun and Magneto Speed have zero mass, so the bullet doesn't move. The Magneto Speed and the gun do. The Magneto Speed, however, measures the velocity of the bullet relative to the muzzle as, say, 3,000 f/s - as the muzzle moves away from the bullet. But the velocity of the bullet relative to the reference plane is zero. So what we want to know - the velocity relative to the reference plane as a result of gun recoil - is NOT measured by the Magneto Speed, which shows 3,000 f/s.