Clark
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 772
My original drawing [ugly sketches].
I might have emailed I used 1018 steel [what speedy metal had] to Manzgear, but when I have spoken with Bob Ruch at Forster about this project, I said nothing about 1018.
If a person had a bushing machined to fit over Josh's stop would that limit the travel enough to allow the use of the Manzgear conversion. Or would Manzgear sell his kit with the countersink? Seems like both parties have it in their best interest to solve the interference issue.
Another thanks for your taking the initiative to seek there support for what should be a easy solution. After all we want both parties to prosper.
Well this thread has sold me on a forester co ax but at this point they are rather hard to come across. Will wait till Graf's get some and switch over. Will keep my rockchucker but I don't use it for priming or bullet pulling so for now it will stay put. It has some movement at full extended ram and I'm having concentricity issues so things gotta change. Thanks for all the good info Dave
The Manzgear shell plate is super stout. It is thicker and made out of harder metal than the Forster shell plate. Plus, it is a better overall design than the original shell plate.
I bought my Coax and Manzgear shell plate at the same time, and so first started using the press with the Manzgear shell plate. I have never used the Forster shell plate. For those that have used the Forster shell plate, how often do they bend?
From an engineering design perspective, once the shell plate is stronger than the case rim, any more strength has no benefit because it is the case rim that will fail. Call this extra unneeded shell plate strength "surplus' strength. I am not saying the Manzgear shell plate has surplus strength, I am just asking the question.
In other words, while a nice option, how necessary is the increased strength of the Manzgear shell plate? If we are forced to choose between the Manzgear shell plate or the Badeau linkages, forgoing better access for "surplus" shell plate strength may not be a good trade.
Seems to me the best solution would be for a single entity to make both an improved shell plate and improved linkages. That way, the maker can insure that the parts are compatible with one another.
JMHO
Just an FYI: I have the improved shell plate by Manzgear. I also have the linkages by Josh Badeau for improved access. Both products are super good!
Unfortunately, the Manzgear shell plate runs into the top of the press when using the Badeau linkages. More specifically, it is the cap screws holding the shell plate in place that hit the press. In other words, when using those two after-market products together, it is the Manzgear shell plate hitting the press that stops the ram's upward travel, rather than the stops on the Badeau linkages.
I looked into sourcing screws that have a lower profile, but couldn't find anything. The Manzgear screws already have a low profile head, so it looks like the best option would be to countersink them. Countersinking screw holes in hardened steel is beyond my abilities, though.
Again, both products are really well made, and each one is a substantial improvement over the OEM part it replaces. But, at least for my press, they are incompatible with one another. Meaning, I unfortunately have to choose between using either the Manzgear shell plate or the Badeau linkages, can't use both.