VLD Pilot
Well-Known Member
22" min barrel length. Your plans may change. Just as staying with an 8 twist would be best if a 140 is ever desired later. Lots of money on a custom. May as well make it as versatile as possible.
1) typically the all copper bullets, though lighter need same twist rate due to length. I too wonder about the idea of pushing an all copper with the 6.5 creed. I would be thinking 6.5 PRC.1. Barrel Twist Rate: I know the 1:8" twist rate is good for the heavier, 143-grain bullets (Hornady ELD-X). However, my hands-down favorite hunting bullet is Barnes. I plan to shoot either the 120-grain TTSX or the 127-grain LRX bullets. Wondering if I should get the 1:8.5" twist rate to stabilize the lighter Barnes bullets, while also being able to stabilize the 143-grain ELD-X bullets.
2. Action: I know I want to go with a Remington 700 action. I've heard great things about to Defiance actions (very smooth). I would also like to stay lightweight, so I would spring for the Anti-X model. However, I would like opinions on if it is worth spending the extra $600-$1000 on the defiance Anti-X action or should I just stick with a stock Remington 700 stainless short action?
3. Need ideas for a good Trigger Guard and Magazine.
4. Cerakote: I plan to Cerekote the action, bolt, bolt handle, and trigger guard. Any recommendations on a good company to use?
Wish they made that Hawkins hunter in LA.1. Stick with 1:8
2. Defiance all the way. Standard anti is the way to go.
3. look at Hawkins precision. They have a flush mount dbm or regular dbm.
4. usually your smith has a good handle on this. Check with them.
Stock. Don't rule out the adj. alpine hunter from AG as well. Solid design.
I've heard they are working on testing it IIRCWish they made that Hawkins hunter in LA.
Been hearing that also. Hope it's out by summerI've heard they are working on testing it IIRC
Good info here. To clarify, I only mentioned the 1:8.5 twist for the 120-grain TTSX bullets, but it seems I'm over thinking this and Injust need to stick with 1:8.Your thinking on twist rates is backwards. The heavier bullet (or mono) needs a faster twist rate to stabilize. The 1:8" is faster than the 1:8.5". If you are wanting to shoot the 127 LRX, absolutely stick with the 1:8", not the 1:8.5". Much better choice. Allows you to shoot a 140-143 also for target shooting. You might even consider a 1:7.5", since the shorter length is going to leave a lot of velocity on the table. Slower velocities also require faster twists to shoot the heavier bullets or monos and stabilize them well.
As for barrel length, unless your can is a 9", I would be looking at a 20" minimum with the 6.5CM. 22" would be even better. You are probably looking at 2800fps max from an 18" barrel with the 127 LRX. My daughter shoots a 22" 6.5SLR, and gets 2925fps suppressed with a 130 Berger OTM. Absolutely slays game. Mule deer bucks from 454, 532, 637, and pronghorn from 260 & 391. She shoots the 127LRX up to 2955fps or the 124 Hammer Hunter at 3001fps. With the lower BCs, 300 yards is a cakewalk, even out to 500. Make sure you get a heavy enough contour to limit barrel sag with the can.
Action, go with the Defiance. Way, WAY lighter than an R700, and the money you would spend on an R700 to bring it up even close would probably be comparable in costs to the Defiance. True and square action, recut threads, side bolt release, M16 extractor, fluted bolt, bolt knob, alloy bolt shroud, firing pin bushing....it adds up very fast to get similar features, plus, you still have an R700 action. Unless you already have the action off a free donor, the Defiance makes way more sense.
Hawkins makes amazing DBM bottom metal.
This is my daughter's 22"+7" can 6.5SLR for length reference against a 20"+9" can 6.5SS.
View attachment 234993
View attachment 234994
Thanks! I'm very excited about this rifle build. I'll be going with a DBM.Go with the custom action. You will have near that by the time you true it all up, have a better action, and higher resale. Your gunsmith should already have established relationships with someone doing the cerakote. Ask your smith about the bottom metal. Do you want ADl, BDL, DBM? Sounds like your set up to build one fine rifle! Let us know what you decide and how it turns out. I agonized over alot of the details of my first build. I'm also extremely pleased with it and in the end, that's what truly matters.
My thought for the shorter barrel is due to adding a 7.5" can to the front of it. That would put me at 25.5" OAL vs almost 30" OAL with a 22" barrel.You won't be handicapped in a woods setting with a 22" over an 18". Both will be lower than your head when slung over shoulder. Mine stays lower than my head when slung and doesn't catch everything overhead in my path.
If that chart is true, you wouldn't lose much by staying with a 20" barrel. Even an 18. Hard to say which powder was used. I think those results may change depending on the powder used. Only my opinion since I've never done a barrel length test on that cartridge.My thought for the shorter barrel is due to adding a 7.5" can to the front of it. That would put me at 25.5" OAL vs almost 30" OAL with a 22" barrel.