Favorite rail mounted bipod?

[Huntnful]

Curious what everyone is using for a rail mounted bipod? Sub 9lb hunting rifles with big backcountry pack in hunts, as well as quite a bit of prone range time. I've killed like 15 animals from prone position on the mountain, so I think I'll stick with that height.

This is the one I was personally looking at buying. But figured why not get more opinions from other long range hunters?!

BT46-LW17 PSR Atlas Bipod: Standard height with ADM 170-S Lever - B&T Industries, L.L.C.

The BT46-LW17 PSR (Precision Sniper Rifle) Atlas Bipod mounts directly to any 1913 style Picatinny rail via the included ADM-170-S lever. It is comprised of 6061-T6 aluminum, except the strengthened inner legs which are made from 7075-T6 aluminum that are Mil-Spec Type III hard coat anodized and...

www.accu-shot.com

 

[WeiserBucks]

I use that exact Atlas, and I'm not even close to changing it for anything else. Everything else that I've tried either sucks or breaks.

 

[Huntnful]

I use that exact Atlas, and I'm not even close to changing it for anything else. Everything else that I've tried either sucks or breaks.

Sweet!! Thanks Justin!

 

[SPitty]

Atlas for me, too!

 

[6.5saum/300rum]

The atlas is the only way to go! That is the exact model I have. It goes everywhere with me from the range to all my hunts.

 

[2buffalo]

I have that bipod and two harris bipods.. Hands down the Harris PSR. I haven't tried anything else. I have looked at others but the PSR is really good so I haven't ordered anything else to try.

 

[Huntnpack]

Atlas CAL. Tall with ADM, Pod Loc lever.
Also have 3" leg extensions, Raider feet, & Hawk Hill Talons. Very versatile.

 

[2buffalo]

I don't think they have pan. I may be mistaken. The pan on the PSR is pretty nice.

 

[Huntnpack]

Yes the CAL is Cant & Lock.
I do not care for the Pan feature for a hunting
Bipod. Personal preference.

 

[brcfo_outdoors]

I own one Atlas and have owned another in the past. I think they are obnoxious to try and adjust the leg height on, especially if you are already down and prone. The collar on the legs just isn't as easy to adjust as some of the other brands where you pull to extend the legs and then have to press a release to retract them (Accu-Tac and some Harris). Also the tension knob thing on the bottom of the Atlas is anything but precise and intuitive. If I were on the market for another bipod today I think I would check out the MDT GRND Pod. It looks to me like it takes the leg positioning and profile of the Atlas, the Pod Lock lever like an upgraded Harris, the leg adjustment from an Accu-Tac, and uses carbon fiber like a Spartan. To me it seems like and interesting addition to the market and comes in at the same weight as the above listed Atlas.

https://mdttac.com/mdt-grnd-pod/

 

[sp6x6]

I prefer the atlas.One spot I sit for bear I have to have one leg back and one forward for set upmost don't do this. I have mine in pouch on belt when hiking.If Im in open country and flopping to look at trophy its on rifle, mine are 6-7# builds

 

[BEEMAN]

I always found I shot better with a Harris than the Atlas. I seem to get lots of vertical with the Atlas. I'm going to try the Atlas again on my new 280 AI. They are sure well made with beautiful machining. Also my Atlas is a older model which has quite a bit of movement in the legs back and forth. I think I'm just not loading it consistently.

 

[sp6x6]

Many advertise light weight, my Atlas is 13 oz,many are over that.Pretty low profile when folded

 

[BirdDog50]

Check out the Hatch bipod out of Idaho.