MudRunner2005
Well-Known Member
Or just let him shoot a REAL precision rifle, and show him that his investment could be sold or traded for something better without the tacticool name.You should borrow his mrad and show him how it's done
Or just let him shoot a REAL precision rifle, and show him that his investment could be sold or traded for something better without the tacticool name.You should borrow his mrad and show him how it's done
Man I hope your right, this is what I've been told. However, like the internet, word off mouth can go astray. We'll just keep burning the barrels out of our .300 WinMags until they're gone.Yep just went back and looked. 300 norma mag for this $50m contract.
The DOD recently ordered some of these rifles in 300prc though
With SOCOM the rules can be fudged a bit, since they're running very specialized missions needing specialized equipment...My question is does Hornady have a FMJ 225 gr bullet for the P.R.C. with a good B.C if I'm not mistaken doesnt the military use FMJ bullets.
That would be MARSOC, not SOCOM. I'm sure standard sniper ammo is FMJ's.My marine sniper nephew told me his ammo was quote "FMJ chiiiit"
No, it's not the Geneva Convention. They just specify rules of engagement. The Geneva convention does not actually specify weapons restrictions. This is a common misconception. It is in fact the Hague Accords that ban specific weaponry, in "Laws and Customs of War on Land" (Hague Convention IV).Isnt the Geneva convention rule only FMJ bullets?
Nobody else makes ammo for a proprietary cartridge like the .300 PRC... Nobody else makes brass. They're getting paid somewhere down the line...Even if they just allow Lake City to tool up for it.Would hornady make anything off this ?? No one said hornady got a contract, just barret-- isnt the 300prc a saami/open market cartridge? Wouldn't federal be contracted to make the ammo?
No-- Hague says " no expanding bullets" but does not specifically say "fmj"Isnt the Geneva convention rule only FMJ bullets?