Nicholasjohn ,
Wishing you a full and speedy recovery .
Take care of yourself .
DMP25-06
Thanks. I'm starting to have some progress, but as with most things of this nature, it has been three steps forward; two steps back. As long as the trend is upward, though, I'm happy. Also, the doctor who is treating this condition for me has a very good track record with Lyme disease, including her own case about a dozen years ago. She has been symptom-free for all these years and is confident that I will be as well.
One thing I would like to pass along right here : It is a myth that if you don't have a bulls-eye rash you haven't been exposed to Lyme. If you have a tick bite, it's best to assume that you have lyme, and treat it accordingly. I got bit on a deer hunt in Minnesota back in '96, and had no bulls-eye rash. The doctor ( an ENT in Billings that I was seeing for the sinus infection that resulted from the flu-like symptoms I had had earlier ) told me "no bulls-eye =no lyme." Now, twenty-some years later, I'm a total mess from
chronic lyme disease, and if it had been treated years ago when it was an acute new case, I would have been over it with just a long course of antibiotics.
All I have read about this says that only about 20% of the cases of lyme exposure by tick bite are accompanied by a bulls-eye rash, so I was in the other 80%. I wouldn't expect an ear, nose & throat specialist in Montana to know this, but an infectious disease specialist from the east coast certainly would have. The moral of the story is that if you get bit by a tick ASSUME THE WORST and deal with it accordingly. Also, if you want to do your homework before you need to know the ins & outs, the doctor who seems to have it figured out the best is a guy named Richard Horowitz, MD form Hyde Park, NY. His is book is "WHY CAN'T I GET BETTER ?" and it's the bible on this condition.
I hope you never need to know any of this, but if you happen to tangle with the wrong tick, getting on it early is the key. Thanks for your well-wishes, Sir.