Defiance AnTi

I really like the anti, just finished up a pair of 6.5 prc, with 4-32 nx8 just under 8lbs
 

Attachments

  • CD91394A-CBB5-47E3-A3E1-F9DDD027658F.jpeg
    CD91394A-CBB5-47E3-A3E1-F9DDD027658F.jpeg
    258.4 KB · Views: 219
That's what I put on mine I really like it. How far have you taken yours too mine only to 600 but I'm still breaking it in.
 
I recently have had 3 rifles built on the Anti Actions, all built by Gary Flach

1st up was a crazy light 280AI 5lbs 2oz, went with a 23 inch #1 Fluted 1-9 twist Benchmark, alloy bottom metal, Wildcat Ultralight CF stock, trigger tech trigger,

shoots ok with my Handloads 59.0grs of R26/ 160gr AB/Fed 210M primers,



I just picked these two rifles up yesterday so haven't been to the range with them yet.......soon !
2nd up was a 6.5 RPM, 24 inch #2 Fluted 1-8 twist Cut Rifled Benchmark, Hawkins bottom metal, Wyatts 3.85" mag box, trigger tech trigger Wildcat Ultralight CF stock, weighed in at 5lbs 12oz on its own and 7lbs 3.7oz scoped with Talleys and a leupold VX6 HD 3-18x44 scope.



3rd was a 300 PRC with a 26inch #4 Fluted 1-9 twist Benchmark, Oberndorf Bottom Metal with a 3.85" Wyatts Mag box and a 300 PRC follower kit, Wildcat Standard weight CF Stock, 6lbs 7oz on its own and 8lbs 3.2oz scoped with Talleys and a Zeiss V4 4-16x44 scope

 
Last edited:
Weatherby Fan, are this medium rings in the Zeiss 4-16? Trying to ensure the boot will clear the optical tube. Thanks.
 
Weatherby Fan, are this medium rings in the Zeiss 4-16? Trying to ensure the boot will clear the optical tube. Thanks.
Those are medium height 30mm Talleys with the Extended front foot, barely clears this way, some scopes WILL NOT clear without the extended front foot.

Only 30mm tubed scope I could get to fit in med Talleys without the extended foot was the VX3i 4.5-14x40, the VX5/VX6 line of scopes the bells to big and the tubes to short, also tried the Zeiss V4 4-16x44 but it needed the extended front foot, you can order them directly from Talley.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top