Dangerous Game rifle, thoughts please?

AJ Peacock

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
2,235
Location
Michigan
All,

I've decided that I have a hole in my arsenal, I absolutely 'need' a dangerous game rifle. Just in case I win the lottery or meet a long lost rich uncle!

I've been doing a bit of reading and dreaming and have 2 animals on my 'must have list', Cape Buffalo and Griz. A friend of mine is leaving after Buf in early Sept. He is using a .375 H&H 24" with 300gr TSX and Solid at 2450-2550fps.

I've kicked around all the big calibers and think the most realistic for me would be a .375 H&H, I know it is far from the biggest/meanest out there. But I think a rifle in the 11-12lb class would be shootable enough for me to 'really' practice a bunch.

I am very partial to the ergonomics of the Rem 700, but the 2 items seem to be lacking with regard's to using it as a dangerous game rifle ( extraction and control round feed). Don't know if both of these can be overcome sufficiently, or if another action (Win 70) would be better suited.

I figure a 22" Heavy barrel on a heavy stock like a McMillan Lazzeroni Sporter would allow me to get around 4200 ft lbs with a 300gr solid at around 2600fps or so; and still have a manageable recoil of 30lb's or less.

I'd have open express sites, as well as a removable 1x4 scope with a wide field of view. I'd have a second scope (probably 2.5x8) that could drop on for hunting non-dangerous game. If I ever got to Africa, I could then use it out to 175+ on the plains game.

OK, What do you think?

I'm afraid that the 'bigger' rifles would not get the use that the .375 would in my case.

Thanks,
AJ
 
Aj

I am a fan of the 416s and hear is the reason.

The range of bullet weights (300,325,350,400 and 410grs)

If you look at the trajectory tables and compair the 416 with
the lighter bullets ,they are very good.

With a heavy rifle recoil is not bad with the lighter bullets.

Also if you plan to go to Africa some countries will not allow anything
under .40 calibre.

And some P H,s will not allow muzzel breaks so weight is good on a
375 or a 416.

I have 2 416s and have shot up to 50 rounds at one sitting before losing
interest.One is a 416 rem in a safari grade 700 rem. and the other is a
416 Buff based on a 375 RUM case (About 100ft/sec slower
than a 416 weatherby) also on a 700 rem long action.

The 300 to 350gr bullets are great for Brown bear and the 400 or 410gr
solids are Cape Buffalo poison.

Shooting the 416 in a lead sled is a non,event.

J E CUSTOM
 
Last edited:
I don't think you can go wrong with a 375. If you think that is as much recoil as you can handle for extended practice, than it sounds like a good choice. I dont like recoil and I shoot a Win Mod 70 375 H&H (no brake) If you intend to shoot plains game in a thick area it's a great choice. If you plan on plains game in an open area like parts of the eastern cape, skip it and bring a 7mm or 30 cal that can reach out. For dangerous game I would shoot the bigest cal.I could shoot well, for me thats a 375. I'm not a huge 70 fan and I didn't need controlled feed, but function is everything in a true DGR rifle. If it were me and I used a 700 it would have a pinned M16 extractor. My 70 is set up to cam over if I need to throw a round in the chamber.
 
AJ, I have never hunted dangerous game, but like you, have given it a lot of thought. The .375 is in my opinion, entry level for dangerous game. Some African countries don't even allow it though because they require minimum .40 cal. I would recommend the .416 Rem mag. It can be used like a .375 for all kinds of game; lots of bullet weights and types, can be loaded down, factory ammo is available, etc. On the extractor question, I have never seen a Remington 700 fail to extract, but I'm sure that there are controlled feed rifles available in the .416 Rem caliber. I've never seen a Mauser action fail to extract either, but have seen them jam on feeding. I doubt any of them are fool-proof though, because it appears that the double rifles are preferred by many P/H's. (No way I could afford one).

I have a Mauser actioned .375 H&H and a Wby MK V .460. I actually enjoy shooting the .460 more than the .375, and if I ever get the chance to hunt dangerous game, will use it. I'm chicken, and would want to use the biggest, baddest rifle that I have. (see my signature). You're right, neither one gets shot much, but I enjoy both, and shoot them occasionally, when I feel like getting my *** kicked.

There are guys on here that have hunted dangerous game and actually know what they're talking about. Maybe they'll jump in.

Good hunting, Tom
 
Are you wanting a true Dangerous game rifle thats intended on stopping a charge weather it be from cracked out Zebra to a 8000lb bull elephant? or are you looking for somthing as an all around rifle for hunting Africa?

If I were going to Aferica I'd be bringing more than one gun , I bring a flat shooting deer/elk style rifle , a mid sized heavy game rifle like the 375 RUM or 416 Rigby , and a "Dangerous" game rifle somthing 458 Win mag at the minimum , A 460 Wby is a great round for Africa , it can be loaded down slightly with lighter bullets in the 350gr class to meet 458 win performance or stoked up to push a 500gr bullet to 2700fps ,the later is pretty punishing in a gun without a brake.

If your going to bring only one gun then I'd look at the 416 Rigby or Weatherby realy hard and they would be at the bottom of the energy scale as a charge stopper
 
There is nothing at all wrong with a properly loaded 375 H&H. I don't know of any country that will not allow it's use and many even allow the 9.3X62 as well. I personally know people that took thier Cape Buffalos (with one shot each) a 300 Win Mag. Allen Day took 2 with his 300 Win. with one shot each

If you can't kill it cleanly with a 375 H&H then you are either use a very bad bullet or you ain't putting the bullet in the correct location
 
Last edited:
AJ, I have never hunted dangerous game, but like you, have given it a lot of thought. The .375 is in my opinion, entry level for dangerous game. Some African countries don't even allow it though because they require minimum .40 cal. I would recommend the .416 Rem mag. It can be used like a .375 for all kinds of game; lots of bullet weights and types, can be loaded down, factory ammo is available, etc. On the extractor question, I have never seen a Remington 700 fail to extract, but I'm sure that there are controlled feed rifles available in the .416 Rem caliber. I've never seen a Mauser action fail to extract either, but have seen them jam on feeding. I doubt any of them are fool-proof though, because it appears that the double rifles are preferred by many P/H's. (No way I could afford one).

I have a Mauser actioned .375 H&H and a Wby MK V .460. I actually enjoy shooting the .460 more than the .375, and if I ever get the chance to hunt dangerous game, will use it. I'm chicken, and would want to use the biggest, baddest rifle that I have. (see my signature). You're right, neither one gets shot much, but I enjoy both, and shoot them occasionally, when I feel like getting my *** kicked.

There are guys on here that have hunted dangerous game and actually know what they're talking about. Maybe they'll jump in.

Good hunting, Tom

It happens, my 700 extractor failed one month before Africa. My 2nd failed extractor came 7 years later. With recoil being a consideration I shoot a 375. I would rather shoot a 416 Rigby. Not needed for Buff. As for the Elephant, my friend dropped his tusker at 20" went home sold his Rigby and now has a 500 Jefrey. Whole different story.
 
There is nothing at all wrong with a properly loaded 375 H&H. I don't know of any country that will not allow it's use and many even allow the 9.3X62 as well. I personally know people that took thier Cape Buffalos (with one shot each) a 300 Win Mag. Allen Day took 2 with his 300 Win. with one shot each

If you can't kill it cleanly with a 375 H&H then you are either use a very bad bullet or you ain't putting the bullet in the correct location


John
I agree but I would never tell someone to use a smaller gun for DG if they can handlle a big bore. 303 killed as many Elephant as all the rest, but not for me. Like you said many buff fell to a 338 Win allso with good results. It's always the charges that will change your thinking. My friend shoots Leopard with a 7mm rem with a NBT after a Med bore punched through without expanding and nearly got him killed. NBTopen fast and drop em.
 
I hunted Cape Buffalo this summer and like my experience with the big brown bears of Alaska, I came away with the feeling that the .375 will do the job but it does not do as well as the bigger bores. John is correct, use the best bullet and place it into a lethal area and most any decently powerful rifle will kill some pretty big beasts. I have used the .416 on a brown bear and a big Alaskan moose, and the .458 Win on one Cape Buff. Not a lot of experience there but doing those hunts let me talk to several great guides and I learned from them as far as calibers go. After a charging brown bear took four .375 Trophy Bonded bullets in the chest one guide said, "That's it, I am going to shoot my .416 Remington from now on."

I am patiently waiting for Winchester to re-introduce the wonderful African rifles, hopefully then a .375 or .416 will find its way to my gun safe. I prefer the .416, in a Rigby if possible but there is something about a good .375 that we should all experience.

My .458 Win. is pretty tough to shoot, particularly from the bench. It is a powerful brute tho, granted there are more powerful and better cartridge designs but the .458 is about all I want to handle.
 
375 h&h

Remington makes a 375 H&H special edition(500made). It is blued with a syn. stock and is only $650. Recoil isn't bad at all with the factory loaded 270gr. I sighted the sights for 50 yards and have around 75 rounds through it. Haven't decided on a scope. It's a cheap way to find out if you want one and if not it is a collector. Just my 2 cents


Brent
 
I shoot a TC Encore in 375 H&H mag, wanted to try one and a barrell is pretty cheap compared to a whole rifle.Though Winchester, Remington and CZ's are not that expensive. Recoil is not that bad and boy is it a shooter. Will make a great Elk, Big Bear or Moose gun. Would love to add a new Kimber in 375 H&H in my safe. If I ever do my dream trip to the Dark Continent it would go along with a 416 Rigby or Rem.

sidepass
 
Remington makes a 375 H&H special edition(500made). It is blued with a syn. stock and is only $650. Recoil isn't bad at all with the factory loaded 270gr. I sighted the sights for 50 yards and have around 75 rounds through it. Haven't decided on a scope. It's a cheap way to find out if you want one and if not it is a collector. Just my 2 cents


Brent

Agree with you on the 375H&H. Been aroung all this time for a reson. I have a Sako AV that will just tear a hole in the paper at 100 yds. I've successfully taken game out to 300 yds with it. Loves the 270 gr TSX. No exciting tales to tell, but everything shot with it has tipped over.
Something special about the 375 H&H, just looking at it makes me think of exciting faraway places.
I have two of the Rem special edition 375 H&H. Would be willing to part with one if anyone is interested
Phil.
 
AJ

I agree with the statment that a 338 will kill anything but its not the
killing that's the issue, It's how fast and when things go bad that the big
bores make the difference.

There was a P H named Bell that killed many many Elephant with a 7/57
Mauser (but he had a gun bearer that backed him up with a big double
rifle).

The word "Dangerous" is the clue, this means that they can and will kill you
if given the chance.

If recoil is the issue then reduce it any way you can to make it shootable
even use a break that is removable so when practicing recoil is minimized
and can be removed if the PH wont allow its use when hunting.

Weight is another recoil tamer .

Most PH's consider the 375 h&h to be the minimum for dangerous game because
of there experiences so I would have to go with there thinking that when things
go bad BIG is Better.

I have loaded rifle cartriges down for youths and let them practice and did not
tell them they were reduced loads and when they fired fullhouse loads at game
they never knew the difference.

On my big bores I load lighter bullets for practice and sight in with the hunting loads.

Better to be safe than sorry

Just an opinion
J E CUSTOM
 
AJ

I agree with the statment that a 338 will kill anything but its not the
killing that's the issue, It's how fast and when things go bad that the big
bores make the difference.

There was a P H named Bell that killed many many Elephant with a 7/57
Mauser (but he had a gun bearer that backed him up with a big double
rifle).

The word "Dangerous" is the clue, this means that they can and will kill you
if given the chance.

If recoil is the issue then reduce it any way you can to make it shootable
even use a break that is removable so when practicing recoil is minimized
and can be removed if the PH wont allow its use when hunting.

Weight is another recoil tamer .

Most PH's consider the 375 h&h to be the minimum for dangerous game because
of there experiences so I would have to go with there thinking that when things
go bad BIG is Better.

I have loaded rifle cartriges down for youths and let them practice and did not
tell them they were reduced loads and when they fired fullhouse loads at game
they never knew the difference.

On my big bores I load lighter bullets for practice and sight in with the hunting loads.

Better to be safe than sorry

Just an opinion
J E CUSTOM

Thanks, I've been thinking more and more about this. Since I reload, I could easily download a .458 and practice all I wanted. I'm really not recoil sensitive, but I don't enjoy it!

I wonder how much the larger frontal area has to do with stopping power? Assume a .375 and .458, both loaded to the same KE (4500lbs or so), Same weight bullet. How much difference does the frontal area make?

I saw a .custom .458 Lott for sale locally (Mauser action and low power scope for $1100). Now THATS a lot of KE!

AJ
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top