sable tireur
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,965
Do you guys think an action with an integrated rail and lug are superior? Like defiant for example. Those types seem to be more money consistently
They generally do cost more money because of the additional tooling and machine time it takes to create the feature. It also adds to the initial cost because of the larger size basic material you need to start with.
You can argue the points about features, technology and its application along with QC for as long as you want to. What it comes down to is this; we are fortunate to have the selection and variety of actions, stocks, triggers and barrel makers which allows us the ability to create almost any design of firearms we choose. Everyone will have an opinion, whether well founded in experience or simply because of what they've read. There is no right or wrong because it's simply an expressed opinion.
I use a lot of different actions, depending on the specified needs and desire of the client. Some I like better than others but the important part of this process is that the quality I want is intact and the client is pleased and satisfied with the end result.
Take the list of actions then review their websites and price lists. Create a 'pros & cons' list on a simple spread sheet and give it some study. Lay out your needs and wants to see if one or more fulfill your list. Handle as many as you can so you have the physical assessment of each or any. How an action functions in real life in a stock with the barrel and trigger attached will be vastly different from what you read. These can be expensive but very important decisions which should be given as much attention as possible.
Good Luck with your Journey.