Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Could milling rings from 34 to 35 “Hawkins hybrids” show strength/integrity problems on larger calibers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="southpa" data-source="post: 3085198" data-attributes="member: 65823"><p>I never thought of that. I guess a quick call to them would help us determine which (if any) receivers the mount would fit. I'm assuming you're talking about their new lightweight mount? Not technically a set of rings? I wish they would have just made it a set of rings instead of a mount and shaved that uneccesary bridge in the middle out. This is just a rant of mine but I can't seem to see the point of the bridge. Adds weight and my thumb likes to ride there when carrying my rifle. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷♂️" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷♂️" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷♂️" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /></p><p></p><p>EDIT: Their site says the mount is compatible with new element actions only.....so a retrofit would seem necessary. Not sure the juice is worth the squeeze over opening up the hawkins?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="southpa, post: 3085198, member: 65823"] I never thought of that. I guess a quick call to them would help us determine which (if any) receivers the mount would fit. I'm assuming you're talking about their new lightweight mount? Not technically a set of rings? I wish they would have just made it a set of rings instead of a mount and shaved that uneccesary bridge in the middle out. This is just a rant of mine but I can't seem to see the point of the bridge. Adds weight and my thumb likes to ride there when carrying my rifle. 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ EDIT: Their site says the mount is compatible with new element actions only.....so a retrofit would seem necessary. Not sure the juice is worth the squeeze over opening up the hawkins? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Could milling rings from 34 to 35 “Hawkins hybrids” show strength/integrity problems on larger calibers?
Top