Clay Target Guy
Well-Known Member
Ok, I started out loading for my Tikka 22-250 1-8 twist with 75 gr ELD bullets using R15 powder. 33.2 gr looked good turning in a low ES and SD with just a little over 3200 FPS, but 33.5gr of R15 showed the best ES and SD both in single numbers with a vel. just over 3250 FPS, but it started to show pressure signs.
I thought I would go back and try to get as close to the 33.5 (as this load was also the most accurate along with the best ES/SD) charge as I could but stay out of the pressure zone so I loaded up some at 33.3 gr.
I had seen where some were using Mag primers, different brands of primers that what I was using so before I started trying to dial in the seating depth, I that I would play with some primers that I had on hand.
The original load was done with Winchester large rifle standard primers, so this would also see if the load would repeat with these again.
I used Winchester LR, Winchester LRM, CCI Mag (did not have any CCI LR primers that I could find), Fed LR, and Fed LRM primers.
The powder,bullets, and cases were all the same, only change was the primers, and each powder charge was hand weighed.
Below are the results from the test. The barrel was allowed to cool between each test of 3 shots.
PRIMER TYPE VEL. FPS ES SD
Winchester Large Rifle Standard 3204 15 7
Winchester Large Rifle Mag 3220 47 23
CCI Large Rifle Mag 3179 38 19
Federal Large Rifle Standard 3164 38 19
Federal Large Rifle Mag 3191 38 19
I know this is a sample size of (1) rifle and one load but still found the numbers a little puzzling in the ES and SD department. I would not have guessed that going to the mag primers would have more than tripled the ES and SD on the Winchester primer. I also found it funny that the ES and SD were exactly the same with the other 3 primers.I also found it funny that I lost vel. across the board with the other primer brands. I did not expect that, seeing as how popular the other primer brands are and I don't see many people using Win. primers when they are posting up their loads.
Just as a FYI, the Winchester LR Standard primers ES/SD were exactly the same as what I tested a few weeks ago. The vel was about 20 FPS slower that the previous test.
It was 84 degrees F. and very humid for the above test, I like to describe it as "air you can wear".
I thought I would go back and try to get as close to the 33.5 (as this load was also the most accurate along with the best ES/SD) charge as I could but stay out of the pressure zone so I loaded up some at 33.3 gr.
I had seen where some were using Mag primers, different brands of primers that what I was using so before I started trying to dial in the seating depth, I that I would play with some primers that I had on hand.
The original load was done with Winchester large rifle standard primers, so this would also see if the load would repeat with these again.
I used Winchester LR, Winchester LRM, CCI Mag (did not have any CCI LR primers that I could find), Fed LR, and Fed LRM primers.
The powder,bullets, and cases were all the same, only change was the primers, and each powder charge was hand weighed.
Below are the results from the test. The barrel was allowed to cool between each test of 3 shots.
PRIMER TYPE VEL. FPS ES SD
Winchester Large Rifle Standard 3204 15 7
Winchester Large Rifle Mag 3220 47 23
CCI Large Rifle Mag 3179 38 19
Federal Large Rifle Standard 3164 38 19
Federal Large Rifle Mag 3191 38 19
I know this is a sample size of (1) rifle and one load but still found the numbers a little puzzling in the ES and SD department. I would not have guessed that going to the mag primers would have more than tripled the ES and SD on the Winchester primer. I also found it funny that the ES and SD were exactly the same with the other 3 primers.I also found it funny that I lost vel. across the board with the other primer brands. I did not expect that, seeing as how popular the other primer brands are and I don't see many people using Win. primers when they are posting up their loads.
Just as a FYI, the Winchester LR Standard primers ES/SD were exactly the same as what I tested a few weeks ago. The vel was about 20 FPS slower that the previous test.
It was 84 degrees F. and very humid for the above test, I like to describe it as "air you can wear".